Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Probing leptonic CP phases in LFV processes

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 6 Nov 2009

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that in general this correlation is of order one which offers a hope of observing CP violation in lepton flavor violating processes for a L-R scale below around 10-30 TeV.

how it is stated · asserted 0.91 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0911.1323 (version 1)
Pith IDMOMKIMCJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBorut Bajc, Goran Senjanovic, Miha Nemevsek. "Probing leptonic CP phases in LFV processes." arXiv:0911.1323 (2009). https://pith.science/paper/MOMKIMCJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,595 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.87 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.95 · compares with prior results 0.56 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study a CP and T violating triple (spin) correlation in the muon to electron conversion in nuclei in the context of the seesaw mechanism. After concluding that the results are negative for all three seesaw types, we turn to the left-right symmetric theories as the original source of seesaw. We find that in general this correlation is of order one which offers a hope of observing CP violation in lepton flavor violating processes for a L-R scale below around 10-30 TeV. We discuss the conditions that could render to (unlikely) conspiracies as to suppress the CP violating effects.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study a CP and T violating triple (spin) correlation in the muon to electron conversion in nuclei in the context of the seesaw mechanism. contribution 1.00 0.80 0.05 asserted 0.79
s1 After concluding that the results are negative for all three seesaw types, we turn to the left-right symmetric theories as the original source of seesaw. result 0.73 0.79 0.12 asserted 0.98
s2 We find that in general this correlation is of order one which offers a hope of observing CP violation in lepton flavor violating processes for a L-R scale below around 10-30 TeV. result 0.80 0.94 0.72 asserted 0.91
s3 We discuss the conditions that could render to (unlikely) conspiracies as to suppress the CP violating effects. limitation 0.46 0.49 0.04 hedged possibility 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.84.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study a CP and T violating triple (spin) correlation in the muon to electron conversion in nuclei in the context of the seesaw mechanism. After concluding that the results are negative for all three seesaw types, we turn to the left-right symmetric theories as the original source of seesaw. We find that in general this correlation is of order one which offers a hope of observing CP violation in lepton flavor violating processes for a L-R scale below around 10-30 TeV. We discuss the conditions that could render to (unlikely) conspiracies as to suppress the CP violating effects.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

11 arXiv papers cite this in 14 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 11 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • Here we present the first analytical computation for the correlation suggested in [ref] for the $μ→e$ conversion process and we extend their work in two ways: first, we compute the correlation for the $μ→eγ$ decay and second we include the full set of effective operators that enter the $μ→e$ conversion process.

    Time-reversal symmetry violation in several Lepton-Flavor-Violating processes · Introduction · 1.00

Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 11 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 15 papers
  • For a detailed calculation and a comprehensive study of LFV in $L-R$ symmetry, see [ref] .

    Lepton Flavor Violation without Supersymmetry · $L-R$ symmetry and LFV · 0.98

  • It is based on an addition of an adjoint $24_F$ fermionic representation [ref] , which leads to the hybrid type I and type III seesaw and no other low energy manifestation.

    Seesaw at LHC · $μ→e$ conversion: leptonic CP phases in the seesaw picture · 0.81

  • These are the so-called triple product correlations, studied at length in the literature as a probe of CP violation [ref] and recently revisited in the context of leptonic CP violation [ref] .

    CP violation at colliders · Introduction · 0.87

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.