RECORD
The Hubble constant inferred from 18 time-delay lenses
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 12 Feb 2010
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We estimate the Hubble constant to be 66_{-4}^{+6} km/s/Mpc (for a flat Universe with \Omega_m=0.3, \Omega_\Lambda=0.7).
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We present a simultaneous analysis of 18 galaxy lenses with time delay measurements. For each lens we derive mass maps using pixelated simultaneous modeling with shared Hubble constant. We estimate the Hubble constant to be 66_{-4}^{+6} km/s/Mpc (for a flat Universe with \Omega_m=0.3, \Omega_\Lambda=0.7). We have also selected a subsample of five relatively isolated early type galaxies and by simultaneous modeling with an additional constraint on isothermality of their mass profiles we get H_0=76 +/-3 km/s/Mpc.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We present a simultaneous analysis of 18 galaxy lenses with time delay measurements. | contribution 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.04 | asserted 0.98 |
| s1 | For each lens we derive mass maps using pixelated simultaneous modeling with shared Hubble constant. | method 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We estimate the Hubble constant to be 66_{-4}^{+6} km/s/Mpc (for a flat Universe with \Omega_m=0.3, \Omega_\Lambda=0.7). | result 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.83 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | We have also selected a subsample of five relatively isolated early type galaxies and by simultaneous modeling with an additional constraint on isothermality of their mass profiles we get H_0=76 +/-3 km/s/Mpc. | result 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.10 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We present a simultaneous analysis of 18 galaxy lenses with time delay measurements. For each lens we derive mass maps using pixelated simultaneous modeling with shared Hubble constant. We estimate the Hubble constant to be 66_{-4}^{+6} km/s/Mpc (for a flat Universe with \Omega_m=0.3, \Omega_\Lambda=0.7). We have also selected a subsample of five relatively isolated early type galaxies and by simultaneous modeling with an additional constraint on isothermality of their mass profiles we get H_0=76 +/-3 km/s/Mpc.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
5 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences
Papers whose main result relates to this one's
States a conflicting result 1 paper
-
Here we make the case for a Hubble constant that is even smaller than the lower bound of the accepted range, arguing on the basis of the great advantages, all theoretical in nature, of a Hubble constant of around 30 km/s/Mpc.
Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label
Uses its data or values 1 paper
-
Indeed the time delay for the first gravitationally lensed quasar Q0957+561 is measured to be 417 days [ref] , and subsequently time delays have been measured for more than 20 quasar lens systems [ref] .
Strong gravitational lensing of explosive transients · Introduction · 0.80
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
So far, time delays have been studied and applied in many ways: to constrain the Hubble parameter $H_0$ [ref] [ref] [ref] ; to study the galaxy mass profile with Monte Carlo simulations [ref] ; to measure the cosmological parameter $w$ [ref] [ref] [ref] [ref] [ref] ; to improve the mass models of galaxies with the time delays of quasars [ref] .
The rates and time-delay distribution of multiply imaged supernovae behind lensing clusters · Introduction · 0.82
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.