Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Derrick's theorem beyond a potential

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 25 Feb 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Here, we show that these galileon theories do not possess stable solitonic solutions.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1002.4873 (version 1)
Pith IDA5F4CT66, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlberto Nicolis, Junpu Wang, Kurt Hinterbichler, Lam Hui, Solomon Endlich. "Derrick's theorem beyond a potential." arXiv:1002.4873 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/A5F4CT66
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,632 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.49 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.75 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Scalar field theories with derivative interactions are known to possess solitonic excitations, but such solitons are generally unsatisfactory because the effective theory fails precisely where nonlinearities responsible for the solitons are important. A new class of theories possessing (internal) galilean invariance can in principle bypass this difficulty. Here, we show that these galileon theories do not possess stable solitonic solutions. As a by-product, we show that no stable solitons exist for a different class of derivatively coupled theories, describing for instance the infrared dynamics of superfluids, fluids, solids and some k-essence models.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Scalar field theories with derivative interactions are known to possess solitonic excitations, but such solitons are generally unsatisfactory because the effective theory fails precisely where nonlinearities responsible for the solitons are important. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 0.98
s1 A new class of theories possessing (internal) galilean invariance can in principle bypass this difficulty. background 0.86 0.06 0.03 hedged possibility 0.99
s2 Here, we show that these galileon theories do not possess stable solitonic solutions. result 0.99 0.95 0.93 asserted 1.00
s3 As a by-product, we show that no stable solitons exist for a different class of derivatively coupled theories, describing for instance the infrared dynamics of superfluids, fluids, solids and some k-essence models. result 0.97 0.93 0.12 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Scalar field theories with derivative interactions are known to possess solitonic excitations, but such solitons are generally unsatisfactory because the effective theory fails precisely where nonlinearities responsible for the solitons are important. A new class of theories possessing (internal) galilean invariance can in principle bypass this difficulty. Here, we show that these galileon theories do not possess stable solitonic solutions. As a by-product, we show that no stable solitons exist for a different class of derivatively coupled theories, describing for instance the infrared dynamics of superfluids, fluids, solids and some k-essence models.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

34 arXiv papers cite this in 50 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 39 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 2 papers
  • An extension of Derrick's theorem to the single galileon case was considered in [ref] , where they concluded that such terms cannot stabilize solitons, here we see how one can get around this conclusion.

    Multi-galileons, solitons and Derrick's theorem · Derrick's theorem and examples · contest 0.76

  • Also, we will point out that ghost instabilities will develop for certain configurations, which has been neglected in [ref] , and clarify why the zero-mode argument of [ref] can not be naively generalized to include the light-like soliton case.

    Note on the Stabilities of the Light-like Galileon Solutions · Introduction · contest 0.87

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • Thirdly, the real measure of the breakdown of the effective field theory is not determined by derivatives of $π_c$, but rather by requiring universally that gradients are small $∂≪Λ_c$ [ref] .

    DBI and the Galileon reunited · Relevant operators and quantum corrections · 0.96

Cites it as background 6 papers
  • It is also an explicit example of the Vainshtein effect, whereby dressing the kinetic term for fluctuations raises the effective cutoff of the theory[For a discussion of how this works in the the simplest Galileon model see [ref] ].

    Low-Energy Effective Field Theory for Chromo-Natural Inflation · Loop Corrections and Technical Naturalness · 0.80

  • The topological defects present in this general class of theories are often termed “$k$-defects," and some aspects of these objects have been studied in earlier works [ref] .

    Doppelganger defects · Introduction · 0.96

  • However, less attention has been paid to their spatially varying, nonlinear dynamics (e.g. [ref] ).

    K-Oscillons: Oscillons with Non-Canonical Kinetic Terms · Introduction · 0.90

What it cites · 12 sentences without a confident label

Cites as support 2 papers
  • The handful of galilean-invariant terms described above represent a consistent truncation of the theory in which we can self-consistently study non-linear classical solutions [ref] .

    Classical and Quantum Consistency of the DGP Model · Introduction · 0.96

  • Here we are rescued by galilean invariance, thanks to which the $L_n$'s above do not get renormalized upon loop corrections, and terms with fewer derivatives per field are not generated quantum-mechanically [ref] .

    Strong Interactions and Stability in the DGP Model · Introduction · 0.98

Cites as background 6 papers
  • Such a symmetry has been dubbed `galilean invariance', and $π$ the `galileon' [ref] .

    The galileon as a local modification of gravity · Introduction · 0.97

  • It is worth mentioning that the galileon describes the sub-horizon dynamics of the scalar sector of the DGP [ref] model ($n=3$), and of more generic theories that modify general relativity in the IR [ref] .

    Classical and Quantum Consistency of the DGP Model · Introduction · 0.92

  • It is worth mentioning that the galileon describes the sub-horizon dynamics of the scalar sector of the DGP [ref] model ($n=3$), and of more generic theories that modify general relativity in the IR [ref] .

    4D Gravity on a Brane in 5D Minkowski Space · Introduction · 0.92

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.