Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Nonlinearly Realized Extended Supergravity

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 3 Mar 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We provide nonlinear realization of supergravity with an arbitrary number of supersymmetries by means of coset construction.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1003.0740 (version 1)
Pith IDQWBU77TU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationK.-I. Izawa, Ryo Takahashi, Y. Nakai. "Nonlinearly Realized Extended Supergravity." arXiv:1003.0740 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/QWBU77TU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,894 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.33 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We provide nonlinear realization of supergravity with an arbitrary number of supersymmetries by means of coset construction. The number of gravitino degrees of freedom counts the number of supersymmetries, which will be possibly probed in future experiments. We also consider goldstino embedding in the construction to discuss the relation to nonlinear realization with rigid supersymmetries.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We provide nonlinear realization of supergravity with an arbitrary number of supersymmetries by means of coset construction. contribution 0.99 0.94 0.75 asserted 1.00
s1 The number of gravitino degrees of freedom counts the number of supersymmetries, which will be possibly probed in future experiments. interpretation 0.83 0.21 0.15 hedged possibility 0.58
s2 We also consider goldstino embedding in the construction to discuss the relation to nonlinear realization with rigid supersymmetries. contribution 0.93 0.85 0.08 asserted 0.77

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.92 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We provide nonlinear realization of supergravity with an arbitrary number of supersymmetries by means of coset construction. The number of gravitino degrees of freedom counts the number of supersymmetries, which will be possibly probed in future experiments. We also consider goldstino embedding in the construction to discuss the relation to nonlinear realization with rigid supersymmetries.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites as background 4 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.