Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Suppression of decoherence effects in the quantum kicked rotor

Quantum Physics · Submitted 15 Apr 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We describe a method allowing transient suppression of decoherence effects on the atom-optics realization of the kicked rotor.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1004.2562 (version 1)
Pith IDCS7N4STM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCERLA), Jean Claude Garreau (PhLAM, Maxence Lepers (PhLAM), V\'eronique Zehnl\'e (PhLAM. "Suppression of decoherence effects in the quantum kicked rotor." arXiv:1004.2562 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/CS7N4STM
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,340 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.65 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We describe a method allowing transient suppression of decoherence effects on the atom-optics realization of the kicked rotor. The system is prepared in an initial state with a momentum distribution concentrated in an interval much sharper than the Brillouin zone; the measure of the momentum distribution is restricted to this interval of quasimomenta: As most of the atoms undergoing decoherence processes fall outside this detection range and thus are not detected, the measured signal is effectively decoherence-free.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We describe a method allowing transient suppression of decoherence effects on the atom-optics realization of the kicked rotor. contribution 1.00 0.84 0.49 asserted 0.98
s1 The system is prepared in an initial state with a momentum distribution concentrated in an interval much sharper than the Brillouin zone; the measure of the momentum distribution is restricted to this interval of quasimomenta: As most of the atoms undergoing decoherence processes fall outside this detection range and thus are not detected, the measured signal is effectively decoherence-free. method 0.97 0.71 0.35 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from argument 0.85.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We describe a method allowing transient suppression of decoherence effects on the atom-optics realization of the kicked rotor. The system is prepared in an initial state with a momentum distribution concentrated in an interval much sharper than the Brillouin zone; the measure of the momentum distribution is restricted to this interval of quasimomenta: As most of the atoms undergoing decoherence processes fall outside this detection range and thus are not detected, the measured signal is effectively decoherence-free.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.