Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Five Kepler target stars that show multiple transiting exoplanet candidates

Earth and Planetary Astrophysics · Submitted 14 Jun 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Should these objects prove to be planetary in nature, then these five systems open new opportunities for the field of exoplanets and provide new insights into the formation and dynamical evolution of planetary systems.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.95 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1006.2763 (version 2)
Pith IDZSR67OYU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citation10), 5), Althea V. Moorhead (7), Daniel C. Fabrycky (4), Darin Ragozzine (4), David Koch (3), David W. Latham (4), Dimitar D. Sasselov (4) Sara Seager (11) Guillermo Torres (4), Douglas A. Caldwell (3, Eric B. Ford (7), Fran\c{c}ois Fressin (4), Geoffrey Marcy (9), Howard Isaacson (9), Jack J. Lissauer (3), Jason F. Rowe (3), Jason H. Steffen (1), Jonathan J. Fortney (8), Jon M. Jenkins (3, Lars A. Buchhave (4, Matthew J. Holman (4), Michael Endl (6), Michael J. Haas (3), Natalie M. Batalha (2), Phillip J. MacQueen (6), Robert C. Morehead (7), Samuel N. Quinn (4), Steve B. Howell (13), William D. Cochran (6), William F. Welsh (12), William J. Borucki (3). "Five Kepler target stars that show multiple transiting exoplanet candidates." arXiv:1006.2763 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/ZSR67OYU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,894 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.87 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.91 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present and discuss five candidate exoplanetary systems identified with the Kepler spacecraft. These five systems show transits from multiple exoplanet candidates. Should these objects prove to be planetary in nature, then these five systems open new opportunities for the field of exoplanets and provide new insights into the formation and dynamical evolution of planetary systems. We discuss the methods used to identify multiple transiting objects from the Kepler photometry as well as the false-positive rejection methods that have been applied to these data. One system shows transits from three distinct objects while the remaining four systems show transits from two objects. Three systems have planet candidates that are near mean motion commensurabilities---two near 2:1 and one just outside 5:2. We discuss the implications that multitransiting systems have on the distribution of orbital inclinations in planetary systems, and hence their dynamical histories; as well as their likely masses and chemical compositions. A Monte Carlo study indicates that, with additional data, most of these systems should exhibit detectable transit timing variations (TTV) due to gravitational interactions---though none are apparent in these data. We also discuss new challenges that arise in TTV analyses due to the presence of more than two planets in a system.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present and discuss five candidate exoplanetary systems identified with the Kepler spacecraft. contribution 0.99 0.93 0.13 asserted 0.99
s1 These five systems show transits from multiple exoplanet candidates. result 0.80 0.80 0.20 asserted 1.00
s2 Should these objects prove to be planetary in nature, then these five systems open new opportunities for the field of exoplanets and provide new insights into the formation and dynamical evolution of planetary systems. interpretation 0.98 0.08 0.37 hedged possibility 0.95
s3 We discuss the methods used to identify multiple transiting objects from the Kepler photometry as well as the false-positive rejection methods that have been applied to these data. method 0.98 0.77 0.02 asserted 0.88
s4 One system shows transits from three distinct objects while the remaining four systems show transits from two objects. result 0.99 0.89 0.08 asserted 1.00
s5 Three systems have planet candidates that are near mean motion commensurabilities---two near 2:1 and one just outside 5:2. result 1.00 0.85 0.05 asserted 1.00
s6 We discuss the implications that multitransiting systems have on the distribution of orbital inclinations in planetary systems, and hence their dynamical histories; as well as their likely masses and chemical compositions. interpretation 0.78 0.50 0.11 hedged possibility 0.54
s7 A Monte Carlo study indicates that, with additional data, most of these systems should exhibit detectable transit timing variations (TTV) due to gravitational interactions---though none are apparent in these data. result 0.81 0.86 0.10 hedged possibility 1.00
s8 We also discuss new challenges that arise in TTV analyses due to the presence of more than two planets in a system. contribution 0.68 0.49 0.04 asserted 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.94 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present and discuss five candidate exoplanetary systems identified with the Kepler spacecraft. These five systems show transits from multiple exoplanet candidates. Should these objects prove to be planetary in nature, then these five systems open new opportunities for the field of exoplanets and provide new insights into the formation and dynamical evolution of planetary systems. We discuss the methods used to identify multiple transiting objects from the Kepler photometry as well as the false-positive rejection methods that have been applied to these data. One system shows transits from three distinct objects while the remaining four systems show transits from two objects. Three systems have planet candidates that are near mean motion commensurabilities---two near 2:1 and one just outside 5:2. We discuss the implications that multitransiting systems have on the distribution of orbital inclinations in planetary systems, and hence their dynamical histories; as well as their likely masses and chemical compositions. A Monte Carlo study indicates that, with additional data, most of these systems should exhibit detectable transit timing variations (TTV) due to gravitational interactions---though none are apparent in these data. We also discuss new challenges that arise in TTV analyses due to the presence of more than two planets in a system.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.