Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Optimal jet radius in kinematic dijet reconstruction

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 18 Jun 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this paper, we compute analytically the optimal jet radius for dijet reconstructions and study its scale dependence.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1006.3634 (version 2)
Pith IDXMX757FT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGregory Soyez. "Optimal jet radius in kinematic dijet reconstruction." arXiv:1006.3634 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/XMX757FT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,909 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Obtaining a good momentum reconstruction of a jet is a compromise between taking it large enough to catch the perturbative final-state radiation and small enough to avoid too much contamination from the underlying event and initial-state radiation. In this paper, we compute analytically the optimal jet radius for dijet reconstructions and study its scale dependence. We also compare our results with previous Monte-Carlo studies.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Obtaining a good momentum reconstruction of a jet is a compromise between taking it large enough to catch the perturbative final-state radiation and small enough to avoid too much contamination from the underlying event and initial-state radiation. background 1.00 0.05 0.04 asserted 1.00
s1 In this paper, we compute analytically the optimal jet radius for dijet reconstructions and study its scale dependence. contribution 0.99 0.97 0.17 asserted 0.98
s2 We also compare our results with previous Monte-Carlo studies. contribution 0.64 0.84 0.03 asserted 0.74

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Obtaining a good momentum reconstruction of a jet is a compromise between taking it large enough to catch the perturbative final-state radiation and small enough to avoid too much contamination from the underlying event and initial-state radiation. In this paper, we compute analytically the optimal jet radius for dijet reconstructions and study its scale dependence. We also compare our results with previous Monte-Carlo studies.

Human review
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • The study has been extended to the LHC in Refs. [ref] where the criterion for optimizing the jet radius is to obtain the best mass resolution for new massive hadronically decaying resonances.

    Jet Radiation Radius · Introduction · 0.84

What it cites · 30 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
  • Our approach thus goes along the same line as [ref] , except that we shall extend the discussion to include extra features requested by the fact that we are looking at a peaked distribution and wish to obtain a more precise determination of $R$.

    Non-perturbative QCD effects in jets at hadron colliders · Introduction · 1.00

Uses the method or tool of 8 papers
  • The quantification of the performance of a given jet definition is also borrowed from [ref] : we define $z$ as the width of the smallest mass window that contains a fraction $f=z$ of the reconstructed objects[In [ref] , z was defined as a fraction of the generated objects rather than a fraction of the reconstructed ones.

    Quantifying the performance of jet definitions for kinematic reconstruction at the LHC · Dijet decay of a massive object · 0.93

  • The properties of the background are computed directly from the Monte-Carlo event sample using FastJet [ref] and the method advocated in [ref] and [ref] : each event is first clustered with the Cambridge/Aachen algorithm with $R=0.6$; $ρ$ and $σ$ are then estimated from the jets that are within a rapidity strip of 1 unit around the hardest dijet system, excluding the two hardest jets in the event.

    Pileup subtraction using jet areas · Computation and comparison with Monte Carlo · 1.00

  • The properties of the background are computed directly from the Monte-Carlo event sample using FastJet [ref] and the method advocated in [ref] and [ref] : each event is first clustered with the Cambridge/Aachen algorithm with $R=0.6$; $ρ$ and $σ$ are then estimated from the jets that are within a rapidity strip of 1 unit around the hardest dijet system, excluding the two hardest jets in the event.

    Dispelling the N^3 myth for the Kt jet-finder · Computation and comparison with Monte Carlo · 1.00

Uses data or values from 1 paper
  • The area properties $a̅$ and $σ_a$ have been calculated, together with their scaling violations in [ref] .

    The Catchment Area of Jets · Computation and comparison with Monte Carlo · 0.81

Compares with 3 papers
Cites as background 15 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.