Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Comments on $\left|\frac{V_{ub}}{V_{cb}}\right|$ and $|V_{ub}|$ from Non-leptonic $B$ Decays within the Perturbative QCD Approach

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 14 Jul 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Within the updated distribution amplitudes and the latest experimental data, we get $\left|{V_{ub}}/{V_{cb}}\right|=0.083\pm0.007$, which favors a bit smaller $|V_{ub}|$ compared with the averaged PDG value, but agrees well the exclusively measured values.

how it is stated · asserted 0.96 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1007.2291 (version 2)
Pith IDUGRYY4FF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC.S. Kim, Ying Li. "Comments on $\left|\frac{V_{ub}}{V_{cb}}\right|$ and $|V_{ub}|$ from Non-leptonic $B$ Decays within the Perturbative QCD Approach." arXiv:1007.2291 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/UGRYY4FF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,444 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.98 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We revisited the extracting $\left|V_{ub}/V_{cb}\right|$ and $|V_{ub}|$ through calculating the ratios ${\cal B}(B^0\to D_s^{(*)+}(\pi^-,\rho^-)/ {\cal B}(B^0\to D_s^{(*)+} D^{(*)-})$ in the perturbative QCD approach, which is regarded as an effective theory in dealing with non-leptonic charmed $B$ decays. Utilizing this approach, we could calculate the form factors effectively as well as non-factorizable and annihilation contributions. Within the updated distribution amplitudes and the latest experimental data, we get $\left|{V_{ub}}/{V_{cb}}\right|=0.083\pm0.007$, which favors a bit smaller $|V_{ub}|$ compared with the averaged PDG value, but agrees well the exclusively measured values. Furthermore, we predict the branching ratio of $\bar B^0 \to D_s^-\rho^+$ $\sim$ $(2.7\pm 1.2)\times 10^{-5}$, which could be measured in $B$ factories near future. In our calculation, the major uncertainty is due to our poor knowledge of heavy meson wave functions. We also comment that it is not trivial to generalize this approach to $B_s$ system, primarily because both $\bar B_s^0 $ and $B_s^0$ can decay into the same final states $D_s^+K^-$ and $D_s^+D_s^-$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We revisited the extracting $\left|V_{ub}/V_{cb}\right|$ and $|V_{ub}|$ through calculating the ratios ${\cal B}(B^0\to D_s^{(*)+}(\pi^-,\rho^-)/ {\cal B}(B^0\to D_s^{(*)+} D^{(*)-})$ in the perturbative QCD approach, which is regarded as an effective theory in dealing with non-leptonic charmed $B$ decays. contribution 0.85 0.89 0.09 asserted 0.98
s1 Utilizing this approach, we could calculate the form factors effectively as well as non-factorizable and annihilation contributions. method 0.96 0.60 0.03 hedged possibility 0.99
s2 Within the updated distribution amplitudes and the latest experimental data, we get $\left|{V_{ub}}/{V_{cb}}\right|=0.083\pm0.007$, which favors a bit smaller $|V_{ub}|$ compared with the averaged PDG value, but agrees well the exclusively measured values. result 0.99 0.96 0.82 asserted 0.96
s3 Furthermore, we predict the branching ratio of $\bar B^0 \to D_s^-\rho^+$ $\sim$ $(2.7\pm 1.2)\times 10^{-5}$, which could be measured in $B$ factories near future. result 0.97 0.93 0.08 hedged possibility 0.86
s4 In our calculation, the major uncertainty is due to our poor knowledge of heavy meson wave functions. limitation 1.00 0.88 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 We also comment that it is not trivial to generalize this approach to $B_s$ system, primarily because both $\bar B_s^0 $ and $B_s^0$ can decay into the same final states $D_s^+K^-$ and $D_s^+D_s^-$. limitation 0.98 0.57 0.04 asserted 0.88

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.95 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.91.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We revisited the extracting $\left|V_{ub}/V_{cb}\right|$ and $|V_{ub}|$ through calculating the ratios ${\cal B}(B^0\to D_s^{(*)+}(\pi^-,\rho^-)/ {\cal B}(B^0\to D_s^{(*)+} D^{(*)-})$ in the perturbative QCD approach, which is regarded as an effective theory in dealing with non-leptonic charmed $B$ decays. Utilizing this approach, we could calculate the form factors effectively as well as non-factorizable and annihilation contributions. Within the updated distribution amplitudes and the latest experimental data, we get $\left|{V_{ub}}/{V_{cb}}\right|=0.083\pm0.007$, which favors a bit smaller $|V_{ub}|$ compared with the averaged PDG value, but agrees well the exclusively measured values. Furthermore, we predict the branching ratio of $\bar B^0 \to D_s^-\rho^+$ $\sim$ $(2.7\pm 1.2)\times 10^{-5}$, which could be measured in $B$ factories near future. In our calculation, the major uncertainty is due to our poor knowledge of heavy meson wave functions. We also comment that it is not trivial to generalize this approach to $B_s$ system, primarily because both $\bar B_s^0 $ and $B_s^0$ can decay into the same final states $D_s^+K^-$ and $D_s^+D_s^-$.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

What it cites · 23 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 7 papers
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 7 papers
  • In the past ten years, many efforts have been promoted to estimate the non-factorizabale contributions quantitatively, such as the QCD fatorization approach (QCDF) [ref] , the perturbative QCD approach (PQCD) [ref] and the soft collinear effective theory (SCET) [ref] .

    QCD Factorization for $B\to\pi\pi$ Decays: Strong Phases and CP Violation in the Heavy Quark Limit · Introduction · 0.88

  • In the past ten years, many efforts have been promoted to estimate the non-factorizabale contributions quantitatively, such as the QCD fatorization approach (QCDF) [ref] , the perturbative QCD approach (PQCD) [ref] and the soft collinear effective theory (SCET) [ref] .

    Fat penguins and imaginary penguins in perturbative QCD · Introduction · 0.88

  • In the past ten years, many efforts have been promoted to estimate the non-factorizabale contributions quantitatively, such as the QCD fatorization approach (QCDF) [ref] , the perturbative QCD approach (PQCD) [ref] and the soft collinear effective theory (SCET) [ref] .

    Penguin Enhancement and $B\to K\pi$ decays in perturbative QCD · Introduction · 0.88

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.