Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Isospin Violation in X(3872): Explanation From a New Tetraquark Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1008.0203 v2 pith:ZKDNFMYW submitted 2010-08-01 hep-ph hep-ex

Isospin Violation in X(3872): Explanation From a New Tetraquark Model

classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords decayisospinproductiondecayselectromagneticchargedconservesdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

New data for X(3872) production in B decays provide a separation between X production and decay, sharpen several experimental puzzles and impose serious constraints on all models. Both charged and neutral B decays produce a narrow neutral resonant state that decays to both J/\psi \rho and J/\psi \omega, while no charged resonances in the same multiplet are found. This suggests that the X is an isoscalar resonance whose production conserves isospin, while isospin is violated only in the decay by an electromagnetic interaction allowing the isospin-forbidden J/\psi \rho decay. A tetraquark isoscalar X model is proposed which agrees with all present data, conserves isospin in its production and breaks isospin only in an electromagnetic X(3872) --> J/\psi \rho^o decay. The narrow X decay width results from the tiny phase space available for the J/\psi \omega decay and enables competition with the electromagnetic isospin-forbidden J/\psi \rho decay which has much larger phase space. Experimental tests are proposed for this isospin production invariance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.