Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Limit distribution with a combination of density functions for a 2-state quantum walk

Quantum Physics · Submitted 18 Oct 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim However, our walk can be localized around the origin.

how it is stated · asserted 0.76 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1010.3481 (version 4)
Pith IDWRP4LAKW, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationTakuya Machida. "Limit distribution with a combination of density functions for a 2-state quantum walk." arXiv:1010.3481 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/WRP4LAKW
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,026 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.23 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.82 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider 2-state quantum walks (QWs) on the line, which are defined by two matrices. One of the matrices operates the walk in certain intervals. In the usual QWs starting from the origin, localization does not occur at all. However, our walk can be localized around the origin. In this paper, we present some limit distributions for the walk.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider 2-state quantum walks (QWs) on the line, which are defined by two matrices. background 0.89 0.24 0.03 asserted 0.99
s1 One of the matrices operates the walk in certain intervals. method 0.81 0.21 0.03 asserted 0.99
s2 In the usual QWs starting from the origin, localization does not occur at all. background 0.99 0.09 0.04 asserted 1.00
s3 However, our walk can be localized around the origin. result 0.92 0.81 0.38 asserted 0.76
s4 In this paper, we present some limit distributions for the walk. contribution 0.96 0.91 0.36 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider 2-state quantum walks (QWs) on the line, which are defined by two matrices. One of the matrices operates the walk in certain intervals. In the usual QWs starting from the origin, localization does not occur at all. However, our walk can be localized around the origin. In this paper, we present some limit distributions for the walk.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.