Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Holographically smeared Fermi surface: Quantum oscillations and Luttinger count in electron stars

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 10 Nov 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It follows that our system is a non-Fermi liquid that nonetheless exhibits Kosevich-Lifshitz quantum oscillations.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1011.2502 (version 2)
Pith IDDDNKEJ6A, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlireza Tavanfar, Diego M. Hofman, Sean A. Hartnoll. "Holographically smeared Fermi surface: Quantum oscillations and Luttinger count in electron stars." arXiv:1011.2502 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/DDNKEJ6A
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,513 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.60 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.40 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We apply a small magnetic field to strongly interacting matter with a gravity dual description as an electron star. These systems are both metallic and quantum critical at low energies. The resulting quantum oscillations are shown to be of the Kosevich-Lifshitz form characteristic of Fermi liquid theory. It is seen that only fermions at a single radius in the electron star contribute to the oscillations. We proceed to show that the Fermi surface area extracted from the quantum oscillations does not obey the simplest statement of the Luttinger theorem, that is, it is not universally proportional to the total charge density. It follows that our system is a non-Fermi liquid that nonetheless exhibits Kosevich-Lifshitz quantum oscillations. We explain how the Luttinger count is recovered via a field theoretic description involving a continuum of `smeared' fermionic excitations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We apply a small magnetic field to strongly interacting matter with a gravity dual description as an electron star. method 0.64 0.90 0.03 asserted 0.92
s1 These systems are both metallic and quantum critical at low energies. background 0.91 0.18 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 The resulting quantum oscillations are shown to be of the Kosevich-Lifshitz form characteristic of Fermi liquid theory. result 0.99 0.84 0.10 asserted 1.00
s3 It is seen that only fermions at a single radius in the electron star contribute to the oscillations. result 1.00 0.88 0.08 asserted 1.00
s4 We proceed to show that the Fermi surface area extracted from the quantum oscillations does not obey the simplest statement of the Luttinger theorem, that is, it is not universally proportional to the total charge density. result 0.99 0.93 0.53 asserted 1.00
s5 It follows that our system is a non-Fermi liquid that nonetheless exhibits Kosevich-Lifshitz quantum oscillations. interpretation 0.90 0.86 0.55 asserted 1.00
s6 We explain how the Luttinger count is recovered via a field theoretic description involving a continuum of `smeared' fermionic excitations. interpretation 0.71 0.87 0.21 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We apply a small magnetic field to strongly interacting matter with a gravity dual description as an electron star. These systems are both metallic and quantum critical at low energies. The resulting quantum oscillations are shown to be of the Kosevich-Lifshitz form characteristic of Fermi liquid theory. It is seen that only fermions at a single radius in the electron star contribute to the oscillations. We proceed to show that the Fermi surface area extracted from the quantum oscillations does not obey the simplest statement of the Luttinger theorem, that is, it is not universally proportional to the total charge density. It follows that our system is a non-Fermi liquid that nonetheless exhibits Kosevich-Lifshitz quantum oscillations. We explain how the Luttinger count is recovered via a field theoretic description involving a continuum of `smeared' fermionic excitations.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

38 arXiv papers cite this in 86 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 57 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • This conclusion is not intrinsic to holographic states supported by fermions, but rather is an artifact of the Thomas-Fermi approximation used in the pioneering work on electron stars [ref] .

    A quantum electron star · Introduction · contest 0.77

Builds on it 1 paper
  • As said in [ref] the arguments used to demonstrate this feature could be generalized to higher dimensions, showing that even in AdS$_5$ Kosevich-Lifshitz oscillations are present, nevertheless the Luttinger theorem is violated.

    A Study on Charged Neutron Star in $AdS_5$ · Kosevich-Lifshitz oscillations in $AdS_5$ neutron star · 0.81

Uses its method or tool 2 papers
Compares with it 5 papers
  • This is analogous to the smearing described in [ref] .

    Friedel Oscillations in Holographic Metals · Lack of Friedel Oscillations · 0.96

  • It also differs from earlier holographic results obtained in a probe limit in [ref] and appears to be due to the gravitational back-reaction which is included in our model.

    Magnetic oscillations in a holographic liquid · Introduction · 0.98

  • [ref] works in the “electron star” geometry [ref] which is also characterized by an IR Lifshitz geometry, but with $z ∼O(1)$, for which there is not an intermediate AdS$_2$ region.

    Semi-local quantum liquids · Discussion · 0.98

Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 17 papers
  • Some progress has been made recently in using holography to learn about metallic states of matter which are not described by Landau's Fermi liquid theory [ref] .

    A quantum electron star · Introduction · 0.99

  • Much recent work [ref] has described the compressible, non-superfluid states of quantum matter by the methods of gauge-gravity duality.

    A model of a Fermi liquid using gauge-gravity duality · Introduction · 0.98

  • Recent work has argued that `electron stars', a planar fluid of charged fermions in Anti-de Sitter space in equilibrium under gravitational and electromagnetic forces, provide a compelling holographic framework in which to study metallic quantum criticality [ref] .

    Electron star birth: A continuous phase transition at nonzero density · Introduction · 0.87

What it cites · 28 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Compares with 2 papers
Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.