Pith.

High Energy Physics - Lattice · arXiv:1011.6309 v1 · submitted 29 Nov 2010

Hadron electric polarizability – finite volume corrections

Andrei Alexandru, Frank Lee

The paper says

“We find that for pion masses lower than 400 MeV the polarizability remains negative even on larger lattices.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We use the background field method to extract the polarizability for the neutral "pion". In our previous study we found that the polarizability for this system is negative which is believed to be a finite volume artifact. To address this issue, we carry out simulations for different lattice sizes and we also look at the influence of the boundary conditions on these results. We find that for pion masses lower than 400 MeV the polarizability remains negative even on larger lattices. An infinite volume extrapolation is attempted, but the results are not conclusive due mainly to a lack of an analytical form for the finite volume corrections for this system.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.97 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.72 · compares with prior results 0.89 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We use the background field method to extract the polarizability for the neutral "pion". method 0.93 0.94 0.03 asserted 1.00
In our previous study we found that the polarizability for this system is negative which is believed to be a finite volume artifact. background 0.86 0.63 0.07 asserted 0.71
To address this issue, we carry out simulations for different lattice sizes and we also look at the influence of the boundary conditions on these results. method 0.86 0.92 0.03 asserted 0.87
We find that for pion masses lower than 400 MeV the polarizability remains negative even on larger lattices. result 1.00 0.96 0.45 asserted 1.00
An infinite volume extrapolation is attempted, but the results are not conclusive due mainly to a lack of an analytical form for the finite volume corrections for this system. limitation 0.99 0.91 0.28 asserted 0.93

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,224 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 4 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

11 arXiv papers cite this in 15 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 11 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • We used a Wilson gauge action with $β=6.0$ which corresponds to a lattice spacing of $a=0.093$ and Wilson fermions since they have less problems with exceptional configurations at small quark masses [ref] .

    Neutron electric polarizability · Numerical results · 0.84

  • For electric polarizability, Eq. [ref] needs to be modified to account for the fact that the lattice calculations are performed using Euclidean formulation [ref] .

    The background field method on the lattice · Background and motivation · 0.84

Uses data or values from 1 paper
  • The electric field, in dimensionless units $η=a^2 |q_d| E = a^2 e E/3 = 5.76×10^-3$, is set to the same value as in our previous study [ref] .

    Neutron electric polarizability · Numerical results · 0.87

Cites as background 4 papers
  • The background field method has been used to compute the electric polarizabilities of neutral hadrons [ref] , baryon magnetic moments [ref] and polarizabilities [ref] and electric polarizabilities for charged hadrons [ref] .

    Baryon magnetic moments in the background field method · Background and motivation · 0.90

  • The background field method has been used to compute the electric polarizabilities of neutral hadrons [ref] , baryon magnetic moments [ref] and polarizabilities [ref] and electric polarizabilities for charged hadrons [ref] .

    Electric Polarizability of Neutral Hadrons from Lattice QCD · Background and motivation · 0.90

  • The background field method has been used to compute the electric polarizabilities of neutral hadrons [ref] , baryon magnetic moments [ref] and polarizabilities [ref] and electric polarizabilities for charged hadrons [ref] .

    Magnetic polarizability of hadrons from lattice QCD in the background field method · Background and motivation · 0.90

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment