Pith.

High Energy Physics - Lattice · arXiv:1012.3135 v1 · submitted 14 Dec 2010

αS from Lattice QCD: progresses and perspectives for a realistic full-QCD determination of the running Strong coupling

B. Blossier, Ph. Boucaud, F. De soto, M. Gravina, V. Morenas, O. Pène, J. Rodríguez-Quintero

The paper says

“Some very recent computations of $\alpha_{\bar{\rm MS}}(M_Z)$ from Nf = 1 + 1 lattice simulations and of the running of the Strong coupling, obtained from the lattice ghost-gluon vertex, over a large momentum window are very briefly reviewed.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

Some very recent computations of $\alpha_{\bar{\rm MS}}(M_Z)$ from Nf = 1 + 1 lattice simulations and of the running of the Strong coupling, obtained from the lattice ghost-gluon vertex, over a large momentum window are very briefly reviewed.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.86

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.17 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
Some very recent computations of $\alpha_{\bar{\rm MS}}(M_Z)$ from $N_f=1+1$ lattice simulations and of the running of the Strong coupling, obtained from the lattice ghost-gluon vertex, over a large momentum window are very briefly reviewed. background 0.81 0.10 0.12 asserted 0.86

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.99 · evidence from literature 0.58

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 1,691 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Five-loop renormalisation of QCD in covariant gauges hep-ph · Sep 2017
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • It is enough to quote an incomplete list of studies of QCD in the infrared which use $⟨A^2 ⟩$ [ref] - [ref] , many of the authors being in the audience; * in order to identify correctly non-perturbative corrections to renormalisation constants; * in order to test and calibrate on a rather extensively computable case Operator Product Expansion : we find larger non-perturbative corrections than usually expected.

    Vacuum expectation value of A^2 from LQCD · Introduction · 0.86

What it cites · 9 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 1 paper
  • Then, we applied this procedure and exploited the ETMC lattice configurations [ref] with $N_f=2$ twisted-mass dynamical quark flavours and, after the conversion of $Λ_T$ to $MS$, obtain (see Fig. [ref].b):

    Light Meson Physics from Maximally Twisted Mass Lattice QCD · Lattice computation of the coupling in the Taylor scheme · 0.93

Cites as background 5 papers
  • This latter had been calculated in the past by following a variety of non-perturbative ways on the lattice (see [ref] and references therein) from quenched and $N_f=2$ gauge configurations; although those results cannot be properly compared with the experimental determinations of the Strong coupling, $α_S(M_Z)$, because of the inaccesibility of the threshold scales of $μ=μ_u,d,s$.

    Running alpha(s) from Landau-gauge gluon and ghost correlations · Introduction · 0.97

  • This latter had been calculated in the past by following a variety of non-perturbative ways on the lattice (see [ref] and references therein) from quenched and $N_f=2$ gauge configurations; although those results cannot be properly compared with the experimental determinations of the Strong coupling, $α_S(M_Z)$, because of the inaccesibility of the threshold scales of $μ=μ_u,d,s$.

    Alpha_s from the non-perturbatively renormalised lattice three-gluon vertex · Introduction · 0.97

  • This latter had been calculated in the past by following a variety of non-perturbative ways on the lattice (see [ref] and references therein) from quenched and $N_f=2$ gauge configurations; although those results cannot be properly compared with the experimental determinations of the Strong coupling, $α_S(M_Z)$, because of the inaccesibility of the threshold scales of $μ=μ_u,d,s$.

    Lattice calculation of $1/p^2$ corrections to $\alpha_s$ and of $\Lambda_{\rm {QCD}}$ in the $\widetilde{MOM}$ scheme · Introduction · 0.97

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment