RECORD
Seeing jets in heavy-ion collisions
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 13 Jan 2011
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The main point we address is the subtraction of the large contamination from the underlying event background.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In these proceedings, we briefly review how jets can be reconstructed in heavy-ion collisions. The main point we address is the subtraction of the large contamination from the underlying event background. We first present the main ingredients needed to define the jets and perform the background subtraction and then discuss the efficiency of the subtraction for different jet algorithms and background-estimation methods.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In these proceedings, we briefly review how jets can be reconstructed in heavy-ion collisions. | background 0.63 | 0.24 | 0.03 | asserted 0.55 |
| s1 | The main point we address is the subtraction of the large contamination from the underlying event background. | contribution 0.56 | 0.24 | 0.18 | asserted 0.93 |
| s2 | We first present the main ingredients needed to define the jets and perform the background subtraction and then discuss the efficiency of the subtraction for different jet algorithms and background-estimation methods. | method 0.54 | 0.73 | 0.08 | asserted 0.60 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In these proceedings, we briefly review how jets can be reconstructed in heavy-ion collisions. The main point we address is the subtraction of the large contamination from the underlying event background. We first present the main ingredients needed to define the jets and perform the background subtraction and then discuss the efficiency of the subtraction for different jet algorithms and background-estimation methods.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites · 11 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 5 papers
-
To conclude, we have studied the possibility to use the jet-area-based subtraction method initially proposed in [ref] to reconstruct full jets in heavy-ion collisions.
Pileup subtraction using jet areas · Conclusions · 0.92
-
The $pp$ events will be generated using Pythia 6.4 [ref] and for the $AA$ events we have used Hydjet 1.6 [ref] .
Heavy ion event generator HYDJET++ (HYDrodynamics plus JETs) · Expected performances · 0.99
-
The $pp$ events will be generated using Pythia 6.4 [ref] and for the $AA$ events we have used Hydjet 1.6 [ref] .
PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual · Expected performances · 0.99
Cites as background 6 papers
-
However, since this often involves rather technical arguments, we will not reproduce them in these proceedings and redirect the interested reader to Ref. [ref] .
Jet Reconstruction in Heavy Ion Collisions · Introduction · 0.93
-
In practice, both RHIC and the LHC have already accumulated a large amount of data and have tried various approaches to address that issue (see e.g. [ref] ).
Observation of a Centrality-Dependent Dijet Asymmetry in Lead-Lead Collisions at sqrt(S(NN))= 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC · Introduction · 0.89
-
In practice, both RHIC and the LHC have already accumulated a large amount of data and have tried various approaches to address that issue (see e.g. [ref] ).
Full Jet Reconstruction in Heavy Ion Collisions · Introduction · 0.89
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.