Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Relating B_s Mixing and B_s -> mu+mu- with New Physics

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 31 Jan 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In most cases, this constrains NP amplitudes for $B_{s} \to \mu^+\mu^-$ to lie below the SM component.

how it is stated · asserted 0.84 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1102.0009 (version 2)
Pith ID3GLMIB5R, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlexey A Petrov, Eugene Golowich, Gagik K Yeghiyan, JoAnne Hewett, Sandip Pakvasa. "Relating B_s Mixing and B_s -> mu+mu- with New Physics." arXiv:1102.0009 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/3GLMIB5R
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,025 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.28 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.27 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.16 · compares with prior results 0.30 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We perform a study of the Standard Model (SM) fit to the mixing quantities $\Delta M_{B_s}$, and $\Delta \Gamma_{B_s}/\Delta M_{B_s}$ in order to bound contributions of New Physics to $B_s$ mixing. We then use this to explore the branching fraction of $B_{s} \to \mu^+\mu^-$ in certain models of New Physics (NP). In most cases, this constrains NP amplitudes for $B_{s} \to \mu^+\mu^-$ to lie below the SM component.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We perform a study of the Standard Model (SM) fit to the mixing quantities $\Delta M_{B_s}$, and $\Delta \Gamma_{B_s}/\Delta M_{B_s}$ in order to bound contributions of New Physics to $B_s$ mixing. contribution 0.91 0.93 0.10 asserted 0.90
s1 We then use this to explore the branching fraction of $B_{s} \to \mu^+\mu^-$ in certain models of New Physics (NP). contribution 0.67 0.88 0.07 asserted 0.93
s2 In most cases, this constrains NP amplitudes for $B_{s} \to \mu^+\mu^-$ to lie below the SM component. result 0.88 0.79 0.63 asserted 0.84

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.96 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.76.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We perform a study of the Standard Model (SM) fit to the mixing quantities $\Delta M_{B_s}$, and $\Delta \Gamma_{B_s}/\Delta M_{B_s}$ in order to bound contributions of New Physics to $B_s$ mixing. We then use this to explore the branching fraction of $B_{s} \to \mu^+\mu^-$ in certain models of New Physics (NP). In most cases, this constrains NP amplitudes for $B_{s} \to \mu^+\mu^-$ to lie below the SM component.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

18 arXiv papers cite this in 28 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Uses its data or values 7 papers
Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 38 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 2 papers
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 6 papers
Cites as background 6 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.