SUSY Predictions for and from the LHC

S. Heinemeyer

RECORD

SUSY Predictions for and from the LHC

S. Heinemeyer

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 4 Mar 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In the CMSSM, NUHM1 and VCMSSM we find preferences for sparticle masses that are relatively light, leading to good prospects for the LHC and the ILC.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,102 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.27 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.13 · compares with prior results 0.31 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

On the basis of frequentist analyses of experimental constraints from electroweak precision data, (g-2)_mu, B-physics and cosmological data, we predict the masses of Higgs bosons and SUSY particles of the CMSSM, NUHM1, VCMSSM and mSUGRA. In the CMSSM, NUHM1 and VCMSSM we find preferences for sparticle masses that are relatively light, leading to good prospects for the LHC and the ILC. Including first data from SUSY searches at the LHC leads to an increase of the preferred sparticle mass scales, but improves the consistency of the model predictions for M_h with the LEP exclusion bounds.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	On the basis of frequentist analyses of experimental constraints from electroweak precision data, (g-2)_mu, B-physics and cosmological data, we predict the masses of Higgs bosons and SUSY particles of the CMSSM, NUHM1, VCMSSM and mSUGRA.	contribution 0.76	0.91	0.19	asserted 1.00
s1	In the CMSSM, NUHM1 and VCMSSM we find preferences for sparticle masses that are relatively light, leading to good prospects for the LHC and the ILC.	result 0.65	0.94	0.36	asserted 1.00
s2	Including first data from SUSY searches at the LHC leads to an increase of the preferred sparticle mass scales, but improves the consistency of the model predictions for M_h with the LEP exclusion bounds.	result 0.98	0.84	0.24	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.65 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

On the basis of frequentist analyses of experimental constraints from electroweak precision data, (g-2)_mu, B-physics and cosmological data, we predict the masses of Higgs bosons and SUSY particles of the CMSSM, NUHM1, VCMSSM and mSUGRA. In the CMSSM, NUHM1 and VCMSSM we find preferences for sparticle masses that are relatively light, leading to good prospects for the LHC and the ILC. Including first data from SUSY searches at the LHC leads to an increase of the preferred sparticle mass scales, but improves the consistency of the model predictions for M_h with the LEP exclusion bounds.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 47 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 28 papers

The numerical evaluation of the frequentist likelihood function using the constraints has been performed with the MasterCode [ref] , which includes the following theoretical codes.

Predictions for m_t and m_W in Minimal Supersymmetric Models · Description of our Frequentist approach · 1.00
The numerical evaluation of the frequentist likelihood function using the constraints has been performed with the MasterCode [ref] , which includes the following theoretical codes.

Prediction for the Lightest Higgs Boson Mass in the CMSSM using Indirect Experimental Constraints · Description of our Frequentist approach · 1.00
The numerical evaluation of the frequentist likelihood function using the constraints has been performed with the MasterCode [ref] , which includes the following theoretical codes.

Predictions for Supersymmetric Particle Masses in the CMSSM using Indirect Experimental and Cosmological Constraints · Description of our Frequentist approach · 1.00

Uses data or values from 8 papers

We approximate the impact of the new CMS constraint by $Δχ^2_CMS ∼χ^2_∞,CMS |(M_C/M) - 1|^-p_C$ (where $M ≡√(m_0^2 + m_1/2^2)$) for each ray in the $(m_0, m_1/2)$ plane, fitting the parameters $M_C, p_C$ by requiring $Δχ^2 ∼4, 5.99$ on the expected and observed 95% exclusion contours shown in Fig. 5 of [ref] , see mc5 for details.

Search for Supersymmetry in pp Collisions at 7 TeV in Events with Jets and Missing Transverse Energy · Description of our Frequentist approach · 0.97
The central ATLAS result, shown in Fig. 2 of [ref] , is again a 95% CL exclusion contour in the $(m_0, m_1/2)$ plane of the CMSSM for the particular values $= 3, A_0 = 0$ and $μ> 0$, which is also only moderately dependent on these additional parameters within the CMSSM [ref] , and can also be taken over to the NUHM1, VCMSSM and mSUGRA models.

Search for supersymmetry using final states with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in sqrt{s} = 7 TeV pp · Description of our Frequentist approach · 0.88
The Higgs boson mass limit in this channel is given as a function of the $ZZH$ coupling in [ref] .

Search for Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons at LEP · Description of our Frequentist approach · 0.84

Compares with 4 papers

[ Anticipated results including early LHC data in the context of frequentist fits were shown, e.g., in mcproc1,mcproc2. ] In tab:compare we compare the best-fit points found incorporating the CMS or ATLAS constraints [ref] with pre-LHC results [ref] in the four scenarios.

Likelihood Functions for Supersymmetric Observables in Frequentist Analyses of the CMSSM and NUHM1 · Results including LHC data · 0.95
[ Anticipated results including early LHC data in the context of frequentist fits were shown, e.g., in mcproc1,mcproc2. ] In tab:compare we compare the best-fit points found incorporating the CMS or ATLAS constraints [ref] with pre-LHC results [ref] in the four scenarios.

Predictions for Supersymmetric Particle Masses in the CMSSM using Indirect Experimental and Cosmological Constraints · Results including LHC data · 0.95
[ Anticipated results including early LHC data in the context of frequentist fits were shown, e.g., in mcproc1,mcproc2. ] In tab:compare we compare the best-fit points found incorporating the CMS or ATLAS constraints [ref] with pre-LHC results [ref] in the four scenarios.

Frequentist Analysis of the Parameter Space of Minimal Supergravity · Results including LHC data · 0.95

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.