Pith. Sign in

RECORD

MDS Array Codes with Optimal Rebuilding

Information Theory · Submitted 19 Mar 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In general, we construct a new family of $r$-erasure correcting MDS array codes that has optimal rebuilding ratio of $\frac{1}{r}$ in the case of a single erasure.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1103.3737 (version 1)
Pith IDNJKJA6PI, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationItzhak Tamo, Jehoshua Bruck, Zhiying Wang. "MDS Array Codes with Optimal Rebuilding." arXiv:1103.3737 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/NJKJA6PI
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,051 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.32 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

MDS array codes are widely used in storage systems to protect data against erasures. We address the \emph{rebuilding ratio} problem, namely, in the case of erasures, what is the the fraction of the remaining information that needs to be accessed in order to rebuild \emph{exactly} the lost information? It is clear that when the number of erasures equals the maximum number of erasures that an MDS code can correct then the rebuilding ratio is 1 (access all the remaining information). However, the interesting (and more practical) case is when the number of erasures is smaller than the erasure correcting capability of the code. For example, consider an MDS code that can correct two erasures: What is the smallest amount of information that one needs to access in order to correct a single erasure? Previous work showed that the rebuilding ratio is bounded between 1/2 and 3/4, however, the exact value was left as an open problem. In this paper, we solve this open problem and prove that for the case of a single erasure with a 2-erasure correcting code, the rebuilding ratio is 1/2. In general, we construct a new family of $r$-erasure correcting MDS array codes that has optimal rebuilding ratio of $\frac{1}{r}$ in the case of a single erasure. Our array codes have efficient encoding and decoding algorithms (for the case $r=2$ they use a finite field of size 3) and an optimal update property.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 MDS array codes are widely used in storage systems to protect data against erasures. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 We address the \emph{rebuilding ratio} problem, namely, in the case of erasures, what is the the fraction of the remaining information that needs to be accessed in order to rebuild \emph{exactly} the lost information? background 0.81 0.22 0.04 unclear 0.57
s2 It is clear that when the number of erasures equals the maximum number of erasures that an MDS code can correct then the rebuilding ratio is 1 (access all the remaining information). background 1.00 0.11 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 However, the interesting (and more practical) case is when the number of erasures is smaller than the erasure correcting capability of the code. background 0.92 0.07 0.02 asserted 0.97
s4 For example, consider an MDS code that can correct two erasures: What is the smallest amount of information that one needs to access in order to correct a single erasure? background 0.84 0.05 0.02 unclear 0.84
s5 Previous work showed that the rebuilding ratio is bounded between 1/2 and 3/4, however, the exact value was left as an open problem. gap 0.98 0.03 0.03 asserted 1.00
s6 In this paper, we solve this open problem and prove that for the case of a single erasure with a 2-erasure correcting code, the rebuilding ratio is 1/2. result 0.83 0.97 0.59 asserted 1.00
s7 In general, we construct a new family of $r$-erasure correcting MDS array codes that has optimal rebuilding ratio of $\frac{1}{r}$ in the case of a single erasure. contribution 0.79 0.96 0.74 asserted 1.00
s8 Our array codes have efficient encoding and decoding algorithms (for the case $r=2$ they use a finite field of size 3) and an optimal update property. contribution 0.76 0.92 0.08 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.92 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

MDS array codes are widely used in storage systems to protect data against erasures. We address the \emph{rebuilding ratio} problem, namely, in the case of erasures, what is the the fraction of the remaining information that needs to be accessed in order to rebuild \emph{exactly} the lost information? It is clear that when the number of erasures equals the maximum number of erasures that an MDS code can correct then the rebuilding ratio is 1 (access all the remaining information). However, the interesting (and more practical) case is when the number of erasures is smaller than the erasure correcting capability of the code. For example, consider an MDS code that can correct two erasures: What is the smallest amount of information that one needs to access in order to correct a single erasure? Previous work showed that the rebuilding ratio is bounded between 1/2 and 3/4, however, the exact value was left as an open problem. In this paper, we solve this open problem and prove that for the case of a single erasure with a 2-erasure correcting code, the rebuilding ratio is 1/2. In general, we construct a new family of $r$-erasure correcting MDS array codes that has optimal rebuilding ratio of $\frac{1}{r}$ in the case of a single erasure. Our array codes have efficient encoding and decoding algorithms (for the case $r=2$ they use a finite field of size 3) and an optimal update property.

Human review
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 2 papers
  • There are several metrics that can be optimized during repair: the total information read from existing disks during repair [ref] , the total information communicated in the network (repair bandwidth [ref] ), or the total number of disks required for each repair [ref] .

    Repair Optimal Erasure Codes through Hadamard Designs · Introduction · 0.93

  • There are several metrics that can be optimized during repair: the total information read from existing disks during repair [ref] , the total information communicated in the network [ref] (called repair bandwidth [ref] ), or the total number of disks required for each repair [ref] .

    Simple Regenerating Codes: Network Coding for Cloud Storage · Introduction · 0.85

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.