Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Choosing Hydrodynamic fields

Statistical Mechanics · Submitted 21 Mar 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Conditions governing the choice for these fields are discussed in the context of granular fluids and multi-component fluids.

how it is stated · asserted 0.83 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1103.3953 (version 1)
Pith IDWHWRIIQI, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJames W. Dufty, J.Javier Brey. "Choosing Hydrodynamic fields." arXiv:1103.3953 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/WHWRIIQI
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,540 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.28 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Continuum mechanics (e.g., hydrodynamics, elasticity theory) is based on the assumption that a small set of fields provides a closed description on large space and time scales. Conditions governing the choice for these fields are discussed in the context of granular fluids and multi-component fluids. In the first case, the relevance of temperature or energy as a hydrodynamic field is justified. For mixtures, the use of a total temperature and single flow velocity is compared with the use of multiple species temperatures and velocities.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Continuum mechanics (e.g., hydrodynamics, elasticity theory) is based on the assumption that a small set of fields provides a closed description on large space and time scales. background 1.00 0.04 0.10 asserted 1.00
s1 Conditions governing the choice for these fields are discussed in the context of granular fluids and multi-component fluids. contribution 0.84 0.48 0.08 asserted 0.83
s2 In the first case, the relevance of temperature or energy as a hydrodynamic field is justified. contribution 0.66 0.54 0.15 asserted 0.98
s3 For mixtures, the use of a total temperature and single flow velocity is compared with the use of multiple species temperatures and velocities. contribution 0.85 0.49 0.13 asserted 0.54

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.56 · evidence from argument 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Continuum mechanics (e.g., hydrodynamics, elasticity theory) is based on the assumption that a small set of fields provides a closed description on large space and time scales. Conditions governing the choice for these fields are discussed in the context of granular fluids and multi-component fluids. In the first case, the relevance of temperature or energy as a hydrodynamic field is justified. For mixtures, the use of a total temperature and single flow velocity is compared with the use of multiple species temperatures and velocities.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.