REVIEW 4 cited by
Explicit BCJ Numerators from Pure Spinors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We derive local kinematic numerators for gauge theory tree amplitudes which manifestly satisfy Jacobi identities analogous to color factors. They naturally emerge from the low energy limit of superstring amplitudes computed with the pure spinor formalism. The manifestation of the color--kinematics duality is a consequence of the superstring computation involving no more than (n-2)! kinematic factors for the full color dressed n-point amplitude. The bosonic part of these results describe gluon scattering independent on the number of supersymmetries and captures any N^kMHV helicity configuration after dimensional reduction to D=4 dimensions.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The Double Copy of Maximal Supersymmetry in $D=4$
N=8 supergravity to cubic order is realized as the off-shell double copy of N=4 super Yang-Mills, with N=8 supersymmetry and SU(8) R-symmetry emerging from the two gauge factors.
-
On differential operators for scalar-scaffolded gluons
Differential operators on scalar-scaffolded variables extract individual phi^3 diagrams from gluon amplitudes, and the independent mixed amplitudes are counted by Catalan numbers.
-
Off-shell double copy theories in BV
A BV-formalism construction gives off-shell double-copy actions for Chern-Simons, BF, and 2D Yang-Mills theories, with Kodaira-Spencer and Kähler gravity as natural examples.
-
HEFT Numerators from Kinematic Algebra
The heavy-mass effective field theory kinematic numerators are derived as the field theory limit of nested commutators of string vertex operators, reproducing and extending earlier fusion-rule results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.