The Supersymmetric Higgs bounds at the Tevatron and the LHC

Julien Baglio

RECORD

The Supersymmetric Higgs bounds at the Tevatron and the LHC

Julien Baglio

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 5 May 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The inferred SUSY Higgs bounds on the $[\tan \beta ; M_A]$ plane and the impact of these uncertainties will also be discussed.

how it is stated · unclear 0.57 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,988 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.66 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.19 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.24 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

MSSM Higgs bosons are the most promising way to discover Higgs physics at hadronic colliders since their cross section is enhanced compared to that of the Standard Model. We will present theoretical predictions for their production and decay in the Higgs$\to \tau \tau$ channel at the Tevatron and the LHC, focusing on the theoretical uncertainties that affect them. The inferred SUSY Higgs bounds on the $[\tan \beta ; M_A]$ plane and the impact of these uncertainties will also be discussed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	MSSM Higgs bosons are the most promising way to discover Higgs physics at hadronic colliders since their cross section is enhanced compared to that of the Standard Model.	background 1.00	0.06	0.07	asserted 0.89
s1	We will present theoretical predictions for their production and decay in the Higgs$\to \tau \tau$ channel at the Tevatron and the LHC, focusing on the theoretical uncertainties that affect them.	contribution 0.99	0.84	0.08	asserted 0.79
s2	The inferred SUSY Higgs bounds on the $[\tan \beta ; M_A]$ plane and the impact of these uncertainties will also be discussed.	contribution 0.79	0.56	0.15	unclear 0.57

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.90 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.90.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

MSSM Higgs bosons are the most promising way to discover Higgs physics at hadronic colliders since their cross section is enhanced compared to that of the Standard Model. We will present theoretical predictions for their production and decay in the Higgs$\to \tau \tau$ channel at the Tevatron and the LHC, focusing on the theoretical uncertainties that affect them. The inferred SUSY Higgs bounds on the $[\tan \beta ; M_A]$ plane and the impact of these uncertainties will also be discussed.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 6 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper

The issue is how to combine the uncertainties and we proceed as stated in Refs. [ref] : the cross section uncertainties are weighted according to their importance and we add linearly the decay branching ratio uncertainty which is $≃+4%,-9%$ on BR$(Φ→τ^+ τ^- ≃10%)$ [ref] .

Revisiting the constraints on the Supersymmetric Higgs sector at the Tevatron · Combinaison with the $Φ→ττ$ branching ratio · 0.92

Compares with 1 paper

The result is comparable to what can be obtained with the theory uncertainty quoted by CMS [ref] .

Search for Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons Decaying to Tau Pairs in pp Collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV · Higgs bounds on the MSSM parameter space · 0.97

Cites as support 1 paper

Squark loops can be safely neglected while SUSY $Δ_b$ corrections to the $Φb b̅$ coupling nearly cancel out in the production cross section times branching ratio calculation [ref] .

Implications of the ATLAS and CMS searches in the channel $pp \to Higgs \to \tau^+\tau^$ for the MSSM and SM Higgs bosons · Introduction · 0.99

Cites as background 2 papers

A more detailed discussion can be found in Refs. [ref]

Revisiting the constraints on the Supersymmetric Higgs sector at the Tevatron · Introduction · 0.80
A more detailed discussion can be found in Refs. [ref]

Implications of the ATLAS and CMS searches in the channel $pp \to Higgs \to \tau^+\tau^$ for the MSSM and SM Higgs bosons · Introduction · 0.80

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.