Pith.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · arXiv:1105.1773 v2 · submitted 9 May 2011

Primordial non-Gaussianity from the 21 cm Power Spectrum during the Epoch of Reionization

Shahab Joudaki (UC Irvine), Olivier Dore (JPL, Caltech), Luis Ferramacho (CNRS, Toulouse), Manoj Kaplinghat (UC Irvine), Mario G. Santos (CENTRA-IST)

The paper says

“We show that experiments such as SKA and MWA could measure f_NL values of order 10.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

Primordial non-Gaussianity is a crucial test of inflationary cosmology. We consider the impact of non-Gaussianity on the ionization power spectrum from 21 cm emission during the epoch of reionization. We focus on the power spectrum on large scales at redshifts of 7 to 8 and explore the expected constraint on the local non-Gaussianity parameter f_NL for current and next-generation 21 cm experiments. We show that experiments such as SKA and MWA could measure f_NL values of order 10. This can be improved by an order of magnitude with a fast-Fourier transform telescope like Omniscope.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: hedged possibility 0.94

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.96 · compares with prior results 0.18 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
Primordial non-Gaussianity is a crucial test of inflationary cosmology. background 1.00 0.03 0.03 asserted 1.00
We consider the impact of non-Gaussianity on the ionization power spectrum from 21 cm emission during the epoch of reionization. contribution 1.00 0.70 0.04 unclear 0.62
We focus on the power spectrum on large scales at redshifts of 7 to 8 and explore the expected constraint on the local non-Gaussianity parameter f_NL for current and next-generation 21 cm experiments. contribution 0.87 0.64 0.11 asserted 0.61
We show that experiments such as SKA and MWA could measure f_NL values of order 10. result 1.00 0.80 0.50 hedged possibility 0.94
This can be improved by an order of magnitude with a fast-Fourier transform telescope like Omniscope. result 0.81 0.61 0.24 hedged possibility 0.71

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.93 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.46

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,242 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 3 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

10 arXiv papers cite this in 14 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 13 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment