Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Naive Dimensional Analysis and Irrelevant Operators

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Matti Antola, Kimmo Tuominen

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 16 May 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We derive a set of easy rules to follow when estimating the coefficients of operators in an effective Lagrangian.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1105.3178 (version 1)
Pith IDJIQT3XT4, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKimmo Tuominen, Matti Antola. "Naive Dimensional Analysis and Irrelevant Operators." arXiv:1105.3178 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/JIQT3XT4
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,223 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We derive a set of easy rules to follow when estimating the coefficients of operators in an effective Lagrangian. In particular, we emphasize how to estimate the size of coefficients originating from irrelevant interactions in the underlying Lagrangian.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We derive a set of easy rules to follow when estimating the coefficients of operators in an effective Lagrangian. contribution 0.96 0.95 0.42 asserted 1.00
s1 In particular, we emphasize how to estimate the size of coefficients originating from irrelevant interactions in the underlying Lagrangian. contribution 0.96 0.68 0.25 asserted 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.88 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We derive a set of easy rules to follow when estimating the coefficients of operators in an effective Lagrangian. In particular, we emphasize how to estimate the size of coefficients originating from irrelevant interactions in the underlying Lagrangian.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Compares with 3 papers
  • Therefore we now generalize the above discussion and derive simple rules for applications and also compare to the rules of NDA presented in [ref] .

    Generalized Dimensional Analysis · Introduction · 0.98

  • Our results are compatible with the ones obtained earlier in e.g. [ref] , our new output is the derivation of a general set of simple rules which are also able to account for irrelevant interactions.

    Naive Dimensional Analysis and Supersymmetry · Introduction · 0.86

  • Our results are compatible with the ones obtained earlier in e.g. [ref] , our new output is the derivation of a general set of simple rules which are also able to account for irrelevant interactions.

    Counting 4 pi 's in Strongly Coupled Supersymmetry · Introduction · 0.86

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.