REVIEW 2 cited by
Topological Susceptibility in Two Flavors Lattice QCD with the Optimal Domain-Wall Fermion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We determine the topological susceptibility of the gauge configurations generated by lattice simulations using two flavors of optimal domain-wall fermion on the $ 16^3 \times 32 $ lattice with length 16 in the fifth dimension, at the lattice spacing $ a \simeq 0.1 $ fm. Using the adaptive thick-restart Lanczos algorithm, we project the low-lying eigenmodes of the overlap Dirac operator, and obtain the topological charge of each configuration, for eight ensembles with pion masses in the range $ 220-550 $ MeV. From the topological charge, we compute the topological susceptibility and the second normalized cumulant. Our result of the topological susceptibility agrees with the sea-quark mass dependence predicted by the chiral perturbation theory and provides a determination of the chiral condensate, $\Sigma^{\bar{MS}}(2 GeV)=[259(6)(7) MeV]^3 $, and the pion decay constant $F_\pi = 92(12)(2)$ MeV.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Topological susceptibilty in lattice QCD with exact chiral symmetry -- the index of overlap-Dirac operator versus the clover topological charge in Wilson flow
The rounded clover topological charge at large Wilson flow time gives the same topological susceptibility as the overlap-Dirac index, despite per-configuration differences on 31.2% of configurations.
-
Lattice gradient flows (de-)stabilizing topological sectors
Iwasaki and DBW2 gradient flows keep the topological charge of SU(2) gauge configurations stable at long flow times, unlike Wilson and Symanzik flows; DBW2 quantizes the charge already near t=0.5.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.