Pith. Sign in

RECORD

TeV Scale Implications of Non Commutative Space time in Laboratory Frame with Polarized Beams

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 26 May 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The results which also depends on the position of the collider, can provide clear and distinct signatures of the model testable at the International Linear Collider(ILC).

how it is stated · asserted 0.60 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1105.5203 (version 2)
Pith ID62OHFIYJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationG. Rajasekaran, N. G. Deshpande, P. K. Das, Sumit K. Garg, T. Shreecharan. "TeV Scale Implications of Non Commutative Space time in Laboratory Frame with Polarized Beams." arXiv:1105.5203 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/62OHFIYJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,101 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.25 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.14 · compares with prior results 0.62 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We analyze $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \gamma\gamma$, $e^{-}\gamma \rightarrow e^{-}\gamma$ and $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow e^{+}e^{-} $ processes within the Seiberg-Witten expanded noncommutative scenario using polarized beams. With unpolarized beams the leading order effects of non commutativity starts from second order in non commutative(NC) parameter i.e. $O(\Theta^2)$, while with polarized beams these corrections appear at first order ($O(\Theta)$) in cross section. The corrections in Compton case can probe the magnetic component($\vec{\Theta}_B$) while in Pair production and Pair annihilation probe the electric component($\vec{\Theta}_E$) of NC parameter. We include the effects of earth rotation in our analysis. This study is done by investigating the effects of non commutativity on different time averaged cross section observables. The results which also depends on the position of the collider, can provide clear and distinct signatures of the model testable at the International Linear Collider(ILC).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We analyze $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \gamma\gamma$, $e^{-}\gamma \rightarrow e^{-}\gamma$ and $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow e^{+}e^{-} $ processes within the Seiberg-Witten expanded noncommutative scenario using polarized beams. contribution 0.89 0.92 0.05 asserted 0.94
s1 With unpolarized beams the leading order effects of non commutativity starts from second order in non commutative(NC) parameter i.e. $O(\Theta^2)$, while with polarized beams these corrections appear at first order ($O(\Theta)$) in cross section. result 0.97 0.68 0.28 asserted 1.00
s2 The corrections in Compton case can probe the magnetic component($\vec{\Theta}_B$) while in Pair production and Pair annihilation probe the electric component($\vec{\Theta}_E$) of NC parameter. result 0.81 0.75 0.20 asserted 0.82
s3 We include the effects of earth rotation in our analysis. method 0.78 0.92 0.02 asserted 0.99
s4 This study is done by investigating the effects of non commutativity on different time averaged cross section observables. method 0.80 0.86 0.05 asserted 0.95
s5 The results which also depends on the position of the collider, can provide clear and distinct signatures of the model testable at the International Linear Collider(ILC). interpretation 0.88 0.82 0.67 asserted 0.60

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We analyze $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \gamma\gamma$, $e^{-}\gamma \rightarrow e^{-}\gamma$ and $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow e^{+}e^{-} $ processes within the Seiberg-Witten expanded noncommutative scenario using polarized beams. With unpolarized beams the leading order effects of non commutativity starts from second order in non commutative(NC) parameter i.e. $O(\Theta^2)$, while with polarized beams these corrections appear at first order ($O(\Theta)$) in cross section. The corrections in Compton case can probe the magnetic component($\vec{\Theta}_B$) while in Pair production and Pair annihilation probe the electric component($\vec{\Theta}_E$) of NC parameter. We include the effects of earth rotation in our analysis. This study is done by investigating the effects of non commutativity on different time averaged cross section observables. The results which also depends on the position of the collider, can provide clear and distinct signatures of the model testable at the International Linear Collider(ILC).

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 28 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 10 papers
  • To construct the NC extension of the standard model (SM) [ref] , which uses the same gauge group and particle content, or for that matter any other gauge theory, be it abelian or non-abelian, one expands the NC gauge fields in non linear power series of $Θ$ [ref] : λ_α(x,Θ) = α(x) + Θ^μν λ^(1)_μν(x;α) + Θ^μν Θ^ησ λ^(2)_μνησ(x;α) + ⋯ A_ρ(x,Θ) = A_ρ(x) + Θ^μν A^(1)_μνρ(x) + Θ^μν Θ^ησ A^(2)_μνησρ(x) + ⋯.

    String Theory and Noncommutative Geometry · Non Commutative Standard Model · 0.87

  • To construct the NC extension of the standard model (SM) [ref] , which uses the same gauge group and particle content, or for that matter any other gauge theory, be it abelian or non-abelian, one expands the NC gauge fields in non linear power series of $Θ$ [ref] : λ_α(x,Θ) = α(x) + Θ^μν λ^(1)_μν(x;α) + Θ^μν Θ^ησ λ^(2)_μνησ(x;α) + ⋯ A_ρ(x,Θ) = A_ρ(x) + Θ^μν A^(1)_μνρ(x) + Θ^μν Θ^ησ A^(2)_μνησρ(x) + ⋯.

    The Standard Model on Non-Commutative Space-Time · Non Commutative Standard Model · 0.87

  • To construct the NC extension of the standard model (SM) [ref] , which uses the same gauge group and particle content, or for that matter any other gauge theory, be it abelian or non-abelian, one expands the NC gauge fields in non linear power series of $Θ$ [ref] : λ_α(x,Θ) = α(x) + Θ^μν λ^(1)_μν(x;α) + Θ^μν Θ^ησ λ^(2)_μνησ(x;α) + ⋯ A_ρ(x,Θ) = A_ρ(x) + Θ^μν A^(1)_μνρ(x) + Θ^μν Θ^ησ A^(2)_μνησρ(x) + ⋯.

    The Z -> gamma gamma, gg Decays in the Noncommutative Standard Model · Non Commutative Standard Model · 0.87

Cites as background 23 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.