Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Light Stop NLSPs at the Tevatron and LHC

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 31 May 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Focusing on the case of prompt decays, we simulate several existing Tevatron and LHC analyses that would be sensitive to this scenario, and find that they allow the stop to be as light as 150 GeV, mostly due to the large top production background.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1106.0030 (version 2)
Pith IDKL7FIMPK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDavid Shih, Yevgeny Kats. "Light Stop NLSPs at the Tevatron and LHC." arXiv:1106.0030 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/KL7FIMPK
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,909 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.66 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.35 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

How light can the stop be given current experimental constraints? Can it still be lighter than the top? In this paper, we study this and related questions in the context of gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking, where a stop NLSP decays into a W, b and gravitino. Focusing on the case of prompt decays, we simulate several existing Tevatron and LHC analyses that would be sensitive to this scenario, and find that they allow the stop to be as light as 150 GeV, mostly due to the large top production background. With more data, the existing LHC analyses will be able to push the limit up to at least 180 GeV. We hope this work will motivate more dedicated experimental searches for this simple scenario, in which, for most purposes, the only free parameters are the stop mass and lifetime.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 How light can the stop be given current experimental constraints? background 0.72 0.04 0.02 unclear 0.99
s1 Can it still be lighter than the top? background 0.71 0.04 0.02 unclear 0.76
s2 In this paper, we study this and related questions in the context of gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking, where a stop NLSP decays into a W, b and gravitino. contribution 0.96 0.66 0.04 asserted 0.95
s3 Focusing on the case of prompt decays, we simulate several existing Tevatron and LHC analyses that would be sensitive to this scenario, and find that they allow the stop to be as light as 150 GeV, mostly due to the large top production background. result 0.99 0.94 0.77 asserted 1.00
s4 With more data, the existing LHC analyses will be able to push the limit up to at least 180 GeV. result 0.78 0.61 0.18 hedged possibility 0.77
s5 We hope this work will motivate more dedicated experimental searches for this simple scenario, in which, for most purposes, the only free parameters are the stop mass and lifetime. future work 1.00 0.09 0.07 hedged possibility 0.43

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

How light can the stop be given current experimental constraints? Can it still be lighter than the top? In this paper, we study this and related questions in the context of gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking, where a stop NLSP decays into a W, b and gravitino. Focusing on the case of prompt decays, we simulate several existing Tevatron and LHC analyses that would be sensitive to this scenario, and find that they allow the stop to be as light as 150 GeV, mostly due to the large top production background. With more data, the existing LHC analyses will be able to push the limit up to at least 180 GeV. We hope this work will motivate more dedicated experimental searches for this simple scenario, in which, for most purposes, the only free parameters are the stop mass and lifetime.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

34 arXiv papers cite this in 44 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 24 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Uses its data or values 1 paper
  • In [ref] , it was estimated that two of the $35$ LHC analyses available at that time would be able to probe stops up to about $180$ GeV, if updated to 1/fb.

    The Status of GMSB After 1/fb at the LHC · Stop NLSP (direct production) · 0.88

Cites it as support 2 papers
Cites it as background 16 papers

What it cites · 47 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 11 papers
Uses data or values from 5 papers
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 7 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.