pith. sign in

arxiv: 1107.0052 · v1 · pith:NNNV7XTUnew · submitted 2011-06-30 · 💻 cs.AI

Ordered Landmarks in Planning

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords planninglandmarksconstraintsgoalsordersreasonableusedachieve
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:NNNV7XTU Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{NNNV7XTU}

Prints a linked pith:NNNV7XTU badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

Many known planning tasks have inherent constraints concerning the best order in which to achieve the goals. A number of research efforts have been made to detect such constraints and to use them for guiding search, in the hope of speeding up the planning process. We go beyond the previous approaches by considering ordering constraints not only over the (top-level) goals, but also over the sub-goals that will necessarily arise during planning. Landmarks are facts that must be true at some point in every valid solution plan. We extend Koehler and Hoffmann's definition of reasonable orders between top level goals to the more general case of landmarks. We show how landmarks can be found, how their reasonable orders can be approximated, and how this information can be used to decompose a given planning task into several smaller sub-tasks. Our methodology is completely domain- and planner-independent. The implementation demonstrates that the approach can yield significant runtime performance improvements when used as a control loop around state-of-the-art sub-optimal planning systems, as exemplified by FF and LPG.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Trace Repair for Temporal Behavior Trees

    cs.LO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Incremental segmentation and landmark-based heuristic repair enable efficient correction of traces exceeding 25,000 entries against temporal behavior tree specifications.