pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.08610 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-10 · 💻 cs.LO

Trace Repair for Temporal Behavior Trees

Sebastian Schirmer , Philipp Schitz , Johann C. Dauer , Bernd Finkbeiner , Sriram Sankaranarayanan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LO
keywords trace repairtemporal behavior treessignal temporal logicmixed-integer linear programmingcyber-physical systemsspecification repairincremental repairlandmark-based repair
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Temporal behavior trees allow trace repairs on large datasets through incremental and heuristic-based methods that bypass full mixed-integer linear programming.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops methods for repairing traces that fail to satisfy specifications written as temporal behavior trees. These trees specify sequences of actions in robotics and cyber-physical systems by composing signal temporal logic formulas with operators for sequential composition, parallel composition, fallbacks, and repetition. Although repairs can be found by encoding the problem as a mixed-integer linear program, this approach becomes impractical for long traces. The authors therefore introduce an incremental strategy that divides the trace into segments and a landmark-based strategy that iteratively applies linear programming guided by the tree's robust semantics. Their experiments demonstrate that both strategies repair traces containing more than twenty-five thousand entries in less than ten minutes, a scale at which the direct mixed-integer approach runs out of memory.

Core claim

We present two practical repair strategies: (1) incremental repair, which reduces the MILP by splitting the trace into segments, and (2) landmark-based repair, which solves the repair problem iteratively using TBT's robust semantics as a heuristic that approximates MILP with more efficient linear programming. In our experiments, we were able to repair traces with more than 25,000 entries in under ten minutes, while MILP runs out of memory.

What carries the argument

Incremental repair by splitting traces into segments to shrink the mixed-integer program, together with landmark-based repair that uses the trees' robust semantics as a heuristic to guide successive linear programs.

If this is right

  • Repairs become feasible for traces exceeding 25,000 entries without exhausting memory.
  • Violations of temporal behavior tree specifications can be explained by the repaired traces.
  • Repaired traces can serve as training examples that avoid the observed problems in robotic or cyber-physical systems.
  • The methods scale to practical sizes where direct mixed-integer linear programming cannot even start.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The landmark heuristic may extend to other temporal logics that admit quantitative robust semantics.
  • Incremental repair could be combined with parallel or distributed solving to handle streaming or online traces.
  • These techniques might lower the cost of debugging and verifying complex action sequences in autonomous systems.

Load-bearing premise

The robust semantics of temporal behavior trees supply a sufficiently accurate heuristic that allows the iterative linear-programming procedure to reach repairs whose quality is close to the optimal mixed-integer solution.

What would settle it

A benchmark comparison where landmark-based repairs differ substantially in quality or cost from full MILP solutions on traces where both methods run to completion would show that the heuristic approximation fails to stay close to optimal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08610 by Bernd Finkbeiner, Johann C. Dauer, Philipp Schitz, Sebastian Schirmer, Sriram Sankaranarayanan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Repair of a UAV ship landing maneuver [16] against a TBT specification. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: TBT to search for at least an apple or an orange at different locations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Segmentation graph for the TBT in Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The values of x for several positions within a trace. Given [0,10]atL1 with fatL1 (x) = x − 2.5, position i = 7 is a good candidate for a landmark. 4 Empirical Evaluation and Case-Studies This section presents two case studies: the robot search task shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Repair using different cost functions: on the left using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Repair to satisfy the heading constrains in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of repair strategies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The repair chooses an earlier aboveTouchdown when omitting •. 5 Related Work STL is mainly used as a specification language for controlling system behaviors. In [12], STL formulas are transformed into a MILP for model-predictive control, generating control inputs that ensure conformance to the specification. How￾ever, MILP’s complexity limits this approach, especially with nested formulas or longer traject… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present methods for repairing traces against specifications given as temporal behavior trees (TBT). TBT are a specification formalism for action sequences in robotics and cyber-physical systems, where specifications of sub-behaviors, given in signal temporal logic, are composed using operators for sequential and parallel composition, fallbacks, and repetition. Trace repairs are useful to explain failures and as training examples that avoid the observed problems. In principle, repairs can be obtained via mixed-integer linear programming (MILP), but this is far too expensive for practical applications. We present two practical repair strategies: (1) incremental repair, which reduces the MILP by splitting the trace into segments, and (2) landmark-based repair, which solves the repair problem iteratively using TBT's robust semantics as a heuristic that approximates MILP with more efficient linear programming. In our experiments, we were able to repair traces with more than 25,000 entries in under ten minutes, while MILP runs out of memory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents two practical strategies for repairing traces against specifications given as temporal behavior trees (TBT): (1) incremental repair, which reduces the MILP formulation by splitting the trace into segments, and (2) landmark-based repair, which iteratively solves the problem via linear programming guided by TBT robust semantics as a heuristic to approximate the MILP optimum. Experiments claim that these methods successfully repair traces exceeding 25,000 entries in under ten minutes, while direct MILP exhausts memory.

Significance. If the landmark-based heuristic reliably produces repairs whose quality (in terms of robustness or edit cost) is close to the MILP optimum, the work would deliver a scalable, practical tool for trace repair in robotics and cyber-physical systems, enabling failure explanation and generation of corrective training examples. The reported scaling results on large traces constitute a concrete engineering contribution that addresses the intractability of exact MILP.

major comments (1)
  1. [§5] §5 (Experiments): while scaling results are shown for traces with >25,000 entries, no side-by-side quantitative comparison of repair quality (robustness values or edit costs) is reported between the landmark-based iterative LP and exact MILP on smaller instances where MILP remains tractable. Such a benchmark is required to substantiate the central claim that the TBT robust semantics heuristic approximates the MILP optimum.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the robust semantics and the landmark selection procedure could be introduced with a small running example to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with TBT.
  2. The description of the incremental repair segmentation strategy would benefit from an explicit statement of how segment boundaries are chosen and whether boundary constraints are preserved across segments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5] §5 (Experiments): while scaling results are shown for traces with >25,000 entries, no side-by-side quantitative comparison of repair quality (robustness values or edit costs) is reported between the landmark-based iterative LP and exact MILP on smaller instances where MILP remains tractable. Such a benchmark is required to substantiate the central claim that the TBT robust semantics heuristic approximates the MILP optimum.

    Authors: We agree that a side-by-side quantitative comparison on smaller instances where MILP remains tractable would strengthen the evidence that the TBT robust semantics heuristic approximates the MILP optimum. In the revised manuscript we will add such experiments, reporting robustness values and edit costs for both the exact MILP and the landmark-based iterative LP on traces of a few hundred to a few thousand entries. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algorithmic strategies and scaling claims are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper presents incremental repair (by trace segmentation) and landmark-based repair (iterative LP guided by TBT robust semantics as heuristic) as practical alternatives to full MILP. These are algorithmic constructions that do not reduce by the paper's own equations to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or prior self-citations. The robust semantics serve as an external heuristic for approximation rather than a quantity defined from the repair outputs. Experimental scaling results on traces >25k entries are reported as direct runtime measurements, not predictions forced by construction. No load-bearing step exhibits the enumerated circular patterns; the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard definition of temporal behavior trees and signal temporal logic without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond domain conventions, or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Temporal behavior trees are formed by composing signal temporal logic specifications using sequential, parallel, fallback, and repetition operators.
    This compositional structure is presupposed by both repair strategies and is stated in the abstract as the target specification formalism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5707 in / 1262 out tokens · 41022 ms · 2026-05-18T17:48:45.234123+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ternary Logic Encodings of Temporal Behavior Trees with Application to Control Synthesis

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Ternary logic encodings of temporal behavior trees enable mixed-integer linear programming for correct-by-construction control synthesis in linear systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    In: 9th Asian Control Conference, ASCC 2013, Istanbul, Turkey, June 23-26,

    Abiyev, R.H., Akkaya, N., Aytac, E.: Control of soccer robots using behaviour trees. In: 9th Asian Control Conference, ASCC 2013, Istanbul, Turkey, June 23-26,

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ASCC.2013.6606326,https: //doi.org/10.1109/ASCC.2013.6606326

    work page doi:10.1109/ascc.2013.6606326 2013

  3. [3]

    In: Abdulla, P.A., Leino, K.R.M

    Annpureddy, Y., Liu, C., Fainekos, G., Sankaranarayanan, S.: S-taliro: A tool for temporal logic falsification for hybrid systems. In: Abdulla, P.A., Leino, K.R.M. (eds.) Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems - 17th International Conference, TACAS 2011, Held as Part of the Joint European Con- ferences on Theory and Practice of ...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19835- 2011

  4. [4]

    In: Silva, A., Leino, K.R.M

    Baier, C., Coenen, N., Finkbeiner, B., Funke, F., Jantsch, S., Siber, J.: Causality- based game solving. In: Silva, A., Leino, K.R.M. (eds.) Computer Aided Veri- fication - 33rd International Conference, CAV 2021, Virtual Event, July 20-23, 2021, Proceedings, Part I. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12759, pp. 894–917. Springer (2021). https://doi....

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81685-8 2021

  5. [5]

    Automatica38(1), 3–20 (2002)

    Bemporad, A., Morari, M., Dua, V., Pistikopoulos, E.N.: The explicit lin- ear quadratic regulator for constrained systems. Automatica38(1), 3–20 (2002). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00174-1,https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005109801001741

    work page doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(01)00174-1 2002

  6. [6]

    In: L¨ ammel, R., Tratt, L., de Lara, J

    Ghzouli, R., Berger, T., Johnsen, E.B., Dragule, S., Wasowski, A.: Behavior trees in action: a study of robotics applications. In: L¨ ammel, R., Tratt, L., de Lara, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering, SLE 2020, Virtual Event, USA, November 16-17,

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    pp. 196–209. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3426425.3426942,https: //doi.org/10.1145/3426425.3426942

    work page doi:10.1145/3426425.3426942 2020

  8. [8]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters8(8), 4729–4736 (2023)

    He, Z., Zhang, X., Jones, S., Hauert, S., Zhang, D., Lepora, N.F.: Tacmms: Tactile mobile manipulators for warehouse automation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters8(8), 4729–4736 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2023.3287363

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2023.3287363 2023

  9. [9]

    Ordered Landmarks in Planning

    Hoffmann, J., Porteous, J., Sebastia, L.: Ordered landmarks in planning. CoRR abs/1107.0052(2011),http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.0052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  10. [10]

    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics17(12), 7968–7979 (2021)

    Hu, H., Jia, X., Liu, K., Sun, B.: Self-adaptive traffic control model with behavior trees and reinforcement learning for agv in industry 4.0. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics17(12), 7968–7979 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3059676 20 Schirmer et al

    work page doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3059676 2021

  11. [11]

    In: NASA Formal Methods Sym- posium

    Kapoor, P., Kang, E., Meira-G´ oes, R.: Safe planning through incremental decom- position of signal temporal logic specifications. In: NASA Formal Methods Sym- posium. pp. 377–396. Springer (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    In: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Con- ference on Decision and Control

    Koo, T., Sastry, S.: Output tracking control design of a helicopter model based on approximate linearization. In: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Con- ference on Decision and Control. vol. 4, pp. 3635–3640. IEEE (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1998.761745

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc.1998.761745 1998

  13. [13]

    In: International collo- quium on theoretical aspects of computing

    Leucker, M., S´ anchez, C.: Regular linear temporal logic. In: International collo- quium on theoretical aspects of computing. pp. 291–305. Springer (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGBED International Workshop on Design, Modeling, and Evaluation of Cyber-Physical Systems

    Raman, V., Maasoumy, M., Donz´ e, A.: Model predictive control from signal tem- poral logic specifications: A case study. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGBED International Workshop on Design, Modeling, and Evaluation of Cyber-Physical Systems. pp. 52–55 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Lindenstrauss and L

    Sato, S., An, J., Zhang, Z., Hasuo, I.: Optimization-based model checking and trace synthesis for complex STL specifications. In: Gurfinkel, A., Ganesh, V. (eds.) Computer Aided Verification - 36th International Conference, CAV 2024, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 24-27, 2024, Proceedings, Part III. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 14683, pp. 282–306. ...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3- 2024

  16. [16]

    Artificial Life22(1), 23–48 (02 2016)

    Scheper, K.Y.W., Tijmons, S., de Visser, C.C., de Croon, G.C.H.E.: Be- havior Trees for Evolutionary Robotics†. Artificial Life22(1), 23–48 (02 2016). https://doi.org/10.1162/ARTL˙a˙00192,https://doi.org/10.1162/ARTL\ _a\_00192

    work page doi:10.1162/artl 2016

  17. [17]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13807484, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13807484

    Schirmer, S., Singh, J., Jensen, E., Dauer, J., Finkbeiner, B., Sankaranarayanan, S.: Temporal behavior trees (Sep 2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13807484, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13807484

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.13807484 2024

  18. [18]

    In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control

    Schirmer, S., Singh, J., Jensen, E., Dauer, J., Finkbeiner, B., Sankaranarayanan, S.: Temporal behavior trees: Robustness and segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. HSCC ’24, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3641513.3650180,htt...

    work page doi:10.1145/3641513.3650180 2024

  19. [19]

    Technical Note AHD-TN-ESPE-302-18 (2018)

    Schmelz, T., Lantzsch, R.: Abschlussbericht: F&t studie - pilotenassistenz f¨ ur schiffsdecklandungen (pilodeck)[final report: F&t study - pilot assitance for ship deck landing (pilodeck)],. Technical Note AHD-TN-ESPE-302-18 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    CEAS Aeronautical Journal12(1), 1–9 (9 2020),https://elib.dlr.de/ 140951/

    Schuchardt, B.I., Dautermann, T., Donkels, A., Krause, S., Peinecke, N., Schwoch, G.: Maritime operation of an unmanned rotorcraft with tethered ship deck landing system. CEAS Aeronautical Journal12(1), 1–9 (9 2020),https://elib.dlr.de/ 140951/

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    In: 2022 IEEE 27th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)

    Sidorenko, A., Hermann, J., Ruskowski, M.: Using behavior trees for coordina- tion of skills in modular reconfigurable cppms. In: 2022 IEEE 27th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). pp. 1–8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA52439.2022.9921558

    work page doi:10.1109/etfa52439.2022.9921558 2022

  22. [22]

    International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer International Pub- lishing, 5th edn

    Vanderbei, R.J.: Linear Programming: Foundations and Extensions. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer International Pub- lishing, 5th edn. (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    New York Academy of Sciences Series, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 1st edn

    Williams, H.P.: Model Building in Mathematical Programming. New York Academy of Sciences Series, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 1st edn. (2013)

    work page 2013