Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Constraint on super-luminal neutrinos from vacuum Cerenkov processes

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 11 Nov 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We conclude that if the muon-neutrino velocity has a quadratic energy dependence, then OPERA result is consistent with non-observation of forbidden neutrino decays and large deviations from the standard pion decay lifetime.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.92 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1111.2725 (version 4)
Pith IDLYRSWIWP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationSoumya Rao, Subhendra Mohanty. "Constraint on super-luminal neutrinos from vacuum Cerenkov processes." arXiv:1111.2725 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/LYRSWIWP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,861 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.48 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.47 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We examine the Cerenkov-like emission of $e^+ e^-$ from muon super-luminal muon neutrinos assuming a quadratic energy dependence of the neutrino velocity arising from Lorentz violating interactions. We find that with the OPERA result for the neutrino-photon velocity difference, the decay length for the process $\nu_\mu\rightarrow \nu_\mu e^+ e^-$ is 17,039 km which is much larger than the OPERA neutrinos path length of 730 km. We also calculate the pion rate for super-luminal outgoing neutrinos, and we find that the deviation of the pion decay length from the standard Lorentz conserving case at the OPERA neutrino energy is 2%. We conclude that if the muon-neutrino velocity has a quadratic energy dependence, then OPERA result is consistent with non-observation of forbidden neutrino decays and large deviations from the standard pion decay lifetime.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We examine the Cerenkov-like emission of $e^+ e^-$ from muon super-luminal muon neutrinos assuming a quadratic energy dependence of the neutrino velocity arising from Lorentz violating interactions. contribution 0.92 0.75 0.03 asserted 0.57
s1 We find that with the OPERA result for the neutrino-photon velocity difference, the decay length for the process $\nu_\mu\rightarrow \nu_\mu e^+ e^-$ is 17,039 km which is much larger than the OPERA neutrinos path length of 730 km. result 1.00 0.94 0.10 asserted 1.00
s2 We also calculate the pion rate for super-luminal outgoing neutrinos, and we find that the deviation of the pion decay length from the standard Lorentz conserving case at the OPERA neutrino energy is 2%. result 1.00 0.95 0.05 asserted 1.00
s3 We conclude that if the muon-neutrino velocity has a quadratic energy dependence, then OPERA result is consistent with non-observation of forbidden neutrino decays and large deviations from the standard pion decay lifetime. interpretation 0.99 0.72 0.95 hedged possibility 0.92

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.61.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We examine the Cerenkov-like emission of $e^+ e^-$ from muon super-luminal muon neutrinos assuming a quadratic energy dependence of the neutrino velocity arising from Lorentz violating interactions. We find that with the OPERA result for the neutrino-photon velocity difference, the decay length for the process $\nu_\mu\rightarrow \nu_\mu e^+ e^-$ is 17,039 km which is much larger than the OPERA neutrinos path length of 730 km. We also calculate the pion rate for super-luminal outgoing neutrinos, and we find that the deviation of the pion decay length from the standard Lorentz conserving case at the OPERA neutrino energy is 2%. We conclude that if the muon-neutrino velocity has a quadratic energy dependence, then OPERA result is consistent with non-observation of forbidden neutrino decays and large deviations from the standard pion decay lifetime.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

14 arXiv papers cite this in 28 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • The authors in Ref. [ref] then approximate the energy loss using a constant value of $δ$ so that they give in their eq.(21) a mean decay time that scales as the 5th power of the $ν$ energy when in fact the dependence of $δ$ on energy shows that the decay time has to scale with the 11th power of this energy, as we have shown here.

    Estimates of Radiation by Superluminal Neutrinos · Introduction · contest 0.91

Builds on it 2 papers
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • Using the above definitions in eq.([ref]) and substituting in eq.([ref]) gives the rate of electron-positron pair emission as [equation] where $f$ is complicated function of $x$, $θ̃$ and $θ̃_̃1̃$ [ref] .

    Neutrino processes with power law dispersion relations · $ν_μ→ν_μe^+e^-$ · 0.82

Compares with it 2 papers
  • Concerning the detailed relationship between our calculation and that in Ref. [ref] , we note that the authors in Ref. [ref] make a numerical estimate for the $ν→ν+e^++e^-$ process with the quadratic dispersion for the $ν$ superluminality and with the usual special relativity dispersion for the $e^-, e^+$ with the result that the coefficient of $G_F^2E^5δ^3(1-4sin^2θ_w+8sin^4θ_w)$ in the Cohen-Glashow process is 1/45197.8 vs the exact result [ref] 1/41672.4, neglecting the lepton rest masses.

    Estimates of Radiation by Superluminal Neutrinos · Introduction · 0.97

  • The results are consistent with [ref] quantitatively and [ref] qualitatively.

    Replaying neutrino bremsstrahlung with general dispersion relations · Introduction · 1.00

Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 18 sentences without a confident label

Compares with 1 paper
  • The OPERA result find that muon neutrinos of average energy 17.5 GeV traverse a distance of 730 km from CERN to Gran Sasso with a velocity $c_ν$ which exceeds the photon velocity, δ(E=17.5GeV)= (v_ν-c)/c= (2.48 ±0.28 (stat) ±0.30 (syst) ) ×10^-5 This is comparable with an earlier measurement of muon neutrino velocity by MINOS [ref] who found that muon neutrinos of average energy 3 GeV traversing a distance 730 km exceed c by an amount, $δ(E=3 GeV)= (5.1 ±2.9) ×10^-5$.

    Measurement of neutrino velocity with the MINOS detectors and NuMI neutrino beam · Introduction · 0.83

Cites as support 4 papers
Cites as background 5 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.