Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Adaptive Particle in Cell: Balanced Discretization and weighted Shape functions

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Juergen Geiser, Julia Duras, Ralf Schneider, Konstantin Matyash, David Tskhakaya, O. Kalentyev

Mathematical Physics · Submitted 6 Dec 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1112.1203 (version 2)
Pith IDQ6IDANLW, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDavid Tskhakaya, Juergen Geiser, Julia Duras, Konstantin Matyash, O. Kalentyev, Ralf Schneider. "Adaptive Particle in Cell: Balanced Discretization and weighted Shape functions." arXiv:1112.1203 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/Q6IDANLW
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 1,570 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.86 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.03 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors. limitation 0.97 0.69 0.03 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.73 · evidence from argument 0.55.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.