REVIEW 1 cited by
Measurement Error Models in Astronomy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
I discuss the effects of measurement error on regression and density estimation. I review the statistical methods that have been developed to correct for measurement error that are most popular in astronomical data analysis, discussing their advantages and disadvantages. I describe functional models for accounting for measurement error in regression, with emphasis on the methods of moments approach and the modified loss function approach. I then describe structural models for accounting for measurement error in regression and density estimation, with emphasis on maximum-likelihood and Bayesian methods. As an example of a Bayesian application, I analyze an astronomical data set subject to large measurement errors and a non-linear dependence between the response and covariate. I conclude with some directions for future research.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Open Source Planning & Control System with Language Agents for Autonomous Scientific Discovery
A multi-agent LLM system with a Planning & Control strategy performs an autonomous Union2.1 cosmology fit and beats single-LLM baselines on a 50-problem DS-1000 subset.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.