RECORD
Jet mass with a jet veto at two loops and the universality of non-global structure
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 14 Dec 2011
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Somewhat surprisingly, we find that, in the small R limit, there is a precise and simple correspondence between the non-global contribution to the integrated jet thrust distribution and the previously calculated non-global contribution to the integrated hemisphere soft function, including subleading terms.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We investigate the exclusive jet mass distribution in e+e- events, defined with a veto on the out-of-jet radiation, at two-loop order. In particular, we calculate the two-loop soft function, which is required to describe this distribution in the threshold region. When combined with other ingredients using soft-collinear effective theory, this generates the complete singular distribution for jet thrust, the sum of the jet masses, at two-loop order. The result is in excellent agreement with full QCD. The integrated jet thrust distribution is found to depend in an intricate way on both the finite jet cone size, R, and the jet veto scale. The result clarifies the structure of the potentially large logarithms (both global and non- global) which arise in jet observables for the first time at this order. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that, in the small R limit, there is a precise and simple correspondence between the non-global contribution to the integrated jet thrust distribution and the previously calculated non-global contribution to the integrated hemisphere soft function, including subleading terms. This suggests that the small R limit may provide a useful expansion for studying other exclusive jet substructure observables.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We investigate the exclusive jet mass distribution in e+e- events, defined with a veto on the out-of-jet radiation, at two-loop order. | contribution 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.05 | asserted 0.93 |
| s1 | In particular, we calculate the two-loop soft function, which is required to describe this distribution in the threshold region. | contribution 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.06 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | When combined with other ingredients using soft-collinear effective theory, this generates the complete singular distribution for jet thrust, the sum of the jet masses, at two-loop order. | method 0.39 | 0.84 | 0.13 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | The result is in excellent agreement with full QCD. | result 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.11 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | The integrated jet thrust distribution is found to depend in an intricate way on both the finite jet cone size, R, and the jet veto scale. | result 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | The result clarifies the structure of the potentially large logarithms (both global and non- global) which arise in jet observables for the first time at this order. | interpretation 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.18 | asserted 1.00 |
| s6 | Somewhat surprisingly, we find that, in the small R limit, there is a precise and simple correspondence between the non-global contribution to the integrated jet thrust distribution and the previously calculated non-global contribution to the integrated hemisphere soft function, including subleading terms. | result 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.48 | asserted 1.00 |
| s7 | This suggests that the small R limit may provide a useful expansion for studying other exclusive jet substructure observables. | future work 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.17 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We investigate the exclusive jet mass distribution in e+e- events, defined with a veto on the out-of-jet radiation, at two-loop order. In particular, we calculate the two-loop soft function, which is required to describe this distribution in the threshold region. When combined with other ingredients using soft-collinear effective theory, this generates the complete singular distribution for jet thrust, the sum of the jet masses, at two-loop order. The result is in excellent agreement with full QCD. The integrated jet thrust distribution is found to depend in an intricate way on both the finite jet cone size, R, and the jet veto scale. The result clarifies the structure of the potentially large logarithms (both global and non- global) which arise in jet observables for the first time at this order. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that, in the small R limit, there is a precise and simple correspondence between the non-global contribution to the integrated jet thrust distribution and the previously calculated non-global contribution to the integrated hemisphere soft function, including subleading terms. This suggests that the small R limit may provide a useful expansion for studying other exclusive jet substructure observables.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
31 arXiv papers cite this in 84 sentences
Papers citing it · 43 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 1 paper
-
Unfortunately, while completing the calculation of [ref] is in principle straightforward given a thorough understanding of the original work, it requires modern techniques to write the final result in a compact way in terms of known, linearly independent, transcendental functions.
The Complete Two-Loop Integrated Jet Thrust Distribution In Soft-Collinear Effective Theory · Introduction · 0.89
Uses its method or tool 3 papers
-
Finally, following the analysis performed in Section 5.2 of reference [ref] , we can approximate $ℓ_j^- - r^2 k_j^+$ and $ℓ_j^- + k_j^+ r$ by $ℓ_j^-$ in the small $r$ limit and then immediately write
The Complete Two-Loop Integrated Jet Thrust Distribution In Soft-Collinear Effective Theory · The Structure of the $ln(r)$ Terms · 0.93
-
The other two terms involve two real gluons, and following [ref] we split them into “In-Out" and “Out-Out" configurations with one and two gluons outside the jet cone.
Factorization and Resummation for Jet Processes · Two-loop soft function $𝒮_2$ · 0.83
-
For all of the integrals except $I_5()$ and $I_9()$, we found that the phase space integrals over $k_1$ and $k_2$ that remain once $q$ has been integrated out could be numerically checked in Mathematica for appropriate real, negative values of $$ using a parametrization employed in earlier work (see Refs. [ref] ).
N$^3$LO Higgs and Drell-Yan production at threshold: the one-loop two-emission contribution · Introduction · 0.95
Uses its data or values 3 papers
-
K^all-in (2)_TC(,ω,r,μ) = (K^⇒^ (2)_hemi(,μ) + K^⇐^ (2)_hemi(,μ)) r^2 = 2 r^2 ∫_0^ ^'∫k_L k_R k_R^-1-4 (k_L)μ^4 g_hemi^(2)()(^'- k_L + k_RQ) = 2 r^2 (-1)4(μQ)^4 [C_A C_F( 4/^3+22/3^2 +(134/9-4π^2/3 )1/ + 772/27+11π^2/9-116 ζ_33 + ( 4784/81 + 67π^2/27 - 137π^4/90 + 484ζ_3/9 ) + (^2)) + C_F n_f T_F ( -8/3^2 - 40/9 - 152/27 - 4π^2/9 - (952/81 + 20π^2/27 + 176ζ_3/9) + (^2))], where we have used Eq. (3.16) of reference [ref] in deriving the third line of Eq. ([ref]).
The Complete Two-Loop Integrated Jet Thrust Distribution In Soft-Collinear Effective Theory · All-In Contributions · 0.83
-
Explicitly, we find [equation] where $S_R^r_3 (r_4)$ is given in [ref] .
Factorization and Resummation for Jet Processes · Two-loop soft function $𝒮_2$ · 0.92
-
Taking the thrust vector as the jet axis leads to a simpler form of the phase-space constraints and enables us to use existing two-loop results for the cone-jet soft function obtained in [ref] .
An Effective Field Theory for Jet Processes · Momentum regions in cone-jet processes · 0.83
Compares with it 1 paper
-
Notice that identical formulae to Eqs.[ref], [ref], [ref] and [ref] have been found in [ref] [Note that in [ref] one has $= /4π$.] using SCET.
QCD resummation for high-p$_T$ jet shapes at hadron colliders · N$^3$LL non-global structure · 0.93
Cites it as support 3 papers
-
This supports the conjecture made in reference [ref] that the resummation of the logarithms of $r$ is tied up with the resummation of the logarithms of $Q2ω$; the form of Eq. ([ref]) suggests that these two classes of potentially large logarithms not controlled by the factorization theorem for jet thrust are naturally intertwined.
The Complete Two-Loop Integrated Jet Thrust Distribution In Soft-Collinear Effective Theory · The Structure of the $ln(r)$ Terms · 1.00
-
However, this (collinear-)soft radiation will displace the jet axis and contaminate the transverse momentum distribution, again introducing a sensitivity to NGLs.[From the direct two-loop calculations for related jet shapes in the soft approximation [ref] , one sees that NGLs are present for all jet radii.
Jet axes and universal transverse-momentum-dependent fragmentation · Introduction · 0.97
-
The contributions to subleading NGLs from such splittings is apparent from a detailed study of the fixed order calculation at two loops [ref] .
Non-Global Logarithms, Factorization, and the Soft Substructure of Jets · Going Beyond the Soft Approximation · 0.96
Cites it as background 20 papers
-
For further details, we refer the interested reader to reference [ref] .
The Complete Two-Loop Integrated Jet Thrust Distribution In Soft-Collinear Effective Theory · The General Structure of the Calculation · 0.86
-
A two-loop calculation of the soft function for hemispherical jets was performed in [ref] and for cone or anti-$k_T$ jets, with an out-of-jet veto, in [ref] .
Resummation of Jet Mass at Hadron Colliders · The Role of Non-Global Logarithms · 0.86
-
Here we address how these can be removed by a refactorization of the soft function, with corrections from the true higher order non-global logarithms (see Refs. [ref] for earlier refactorization discussions).
Jet Mass Spectra in Higgs + One Jet at NNLL · Refactorization of the Soft Function · 0.84
What it cites · 86 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
-
We therefore followed the approach of Ref. [ref] in Section [ref] and calculated only those contributions to the soft function which depend on ratios of dimensionful scales.
Double Non-Global Logarithms In-N-Out of Jets · The Jet Thrust Distribution at Two-Loops · 0.97
Compares with 5 papers
-
To see this, after performing the trivial integrations over $k_L$ and $k_R$ in Eq. ([ref]) above, replace the phase-spaces cuts that depend on $k^-$ and $q^-$ using ([ref]) and then compare the resulting product of thetas and deltas in the integrand to the second line of Eq. (13) in Ref. [ref] (with $k_L = 2 r λ$ and $k_R = Q ^'$).
The two-loop hemisphere soft function · In-out rescaling at small $R$ · 0.93
-
For example, in Eq. ([ref]) above, the leading NGL is simply C_F C_A(16 Li_2(r^2)-8/3π^2)ln^2 (τ_ωQ/2 ω) . which agrees with results from Refs. [ref] .
Resummation of jet mass with and without a jet veto · Analytic checks and definition of the non-global contribution · 0.94
-
For example, in Eq. ([ref]) above, the leading NGL is simply C_F C_A(16 Li_2(r^2)-8/3π^2)ln^2 (τ_ωQ/2 ω) . which agrees with results from Refs. [ref] .
Double Non-Global Logarithms In-N-Out of Jets · Analytic checks and definition of the non-global contribution · 0.94
Cites as background 14 papers
-
In this section, we briefly review the definition of $τ_ω$ and recapitulate the main results of Ref. [ref] which sets the stage for the exact results calculated in the present paper.
Resummation of jet mass with and without a jet veto · Jet Thrust in SCET · 0.87
-
Resummation of these NGLs seems difficult [ref] .
Soft gluons away from jets: distribution and correlation · Conclusions · 0.81
-
Resummation of these NGLs seems difficult [ref] .
The two-loop hemisphere soft function · Conclusions · 0.81
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.