Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Finite-size effects of beta-deformed AdS_5/CFT_4 at strong coupling

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 12 Jan 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Based on the exact S-martix conjectured for the deformed theory, we generalize the Luscher formula to include twisted boundary conditions and show that the results match with those derived both by finite-size classical solutions of the giant magnon and by algebraic curve analysis.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1201.2635 (version 1)
Pith ID6PM7QZUX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChangrim Ahn, Diego Bombardelli, Minkyoo Kim. "Finite-size effects of beta-deformed AdS_5/CFT_4 at strong coupling." arXiv:1201.2635 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/6PM7QZUX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,377 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.32 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We compute both classical and quantum finite-size corrections at leading order in the strong coupling limit for the (dyonic) giant magnon in the Lunin-Maldacena background. Based on the exact S-martix conjectured for the deformed theory, we generalize the Luscher formula to include twisted boundary conditions and show that the results match with those derived both by finite-size classical solutions of the giant magnon and by algebraic curve analysis.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We compute both classical and quantum finite-size corrections at leading order in the strong coupling limit for the (dyonic) giant magnon in the Lunin-Maldacena background. contribution 0.98 0.96 0.24 asserted 1.00
s1 Based on the exact S-martix conjectured for the deformed theory, we generalize the Luscher formula to include twisted boundary conditions and show that the results match with those derived both by finite-size classical solutions of the giant magnon and by algebraic curve analysis. contribution 0.51 0.92 0.55 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We compute both classical and quantum finite-size corrections at leading order in the strong coupling limit for the (dyonic) giant magnon in the Lunin-Maldacena background. Based on the exact S-martix conjectured for the deformed theory, we generalize the Luscher formula to include twisted boundary conditions and show that the results match with those derived both by finite-size classical solutions of the giant magnon and by algebraic curve analysis.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
  • Also, one can easily check that the $AK$-matrix elements are matched well with the twist factors of the three-spin Bethe equations in [ref] ] : [equation] For consistency, the specific differences between the twisted quasimomenta should be matched with the scaling limit of the BR Bethe equations.[In [ref] , twisted quasimomenta were obtained from the scaling limit of the BR BAEs and the giant magnon in the $β$-deformed case was studied from the quasimomenta.] These can be checked simply by the following relations : [equation] since the elements of $AK$ appear in the scaled BR Bethe equations separately such as [equation]

    Spectral curve for gamma-deformed AdS/CFT · Comparison to BR BAEs · 0.95

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 36 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
  • Then one can obtain the twists ([ref]), up to the terms depending on the momentum $p$, by mapping the worldsheet excitations to the various physical polarizations of the algebraic curve fluctuations [ref] : [equation] If we use $ϕ̃̃̃_1(2π)-ϕ̃̃̃_1(0)=p=p_ws+2πβQ$ and $ϕ̃̃̃_2(2π)-ϕ̃̃̃_2(0)=2π(n_2-βJ)$ in the notations of [ref] , our twists ([ref]) also match the quasi-momentum asymptotic behaviors for the $SU(2)_β$ sector derived there [Actually it is not clear how to extend the analysis of [ref] to unphysical configurations, such as a single (dyonic) giant magnon, and to all the finite-gap solutions of the $β$-deformed theory.

    Quantum Scattering of Giant Magnons · Twisted algebraic curve and quantum finite-size correction from the $F$-term · 0.82

Cites as background 6 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.