Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Asymmetric Higgsino Dark Matter

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 12 Jan 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that this is indeed possible.

how it is stated · asserted 0.84 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1201.2699 (version 1)
Pith ID7CB5YAN6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAielet Efrati, Antonio Riotto, Kfir Blum, Yosef Nir, Yuval Grossman. "Asymmetric Higgsino Dark Matter." arXiv:1201.2699 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/7CB5YAN6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,137 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.73 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.80 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In the supersymmetric framework, a higgsino asymmetry exists in the universe before the electroweak phase transition. We investigate whether the higgsino is a viable asymmetric dark matter candidate. We find that this is indeed possible. The gauginos, squarks and sleptons must all be very heavy, such that the only electroweak-scale superpartners are the higgsinos. The temperature of the electroweak phase transition must be in the (1-10) GeV range.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In the supersymmetric framework, a higgsino asymmetry exists in the universe before the electroweak phase transition. background 0.99 0.10 0.04 asserted 1.00
s1 We investigate whether the higgsino is a viable asymmetric dark matter candidate. contribution 0.97 0.67 0.03 unclear 0.53
s2 We find that this is indeed possible. result 1.00 0.94 0.73 asserted 0.84
s3 The gauginos, squarks and sleptons must all be very heavy, such that the only electroweak-scale superpartners are the higgsinos. result 0.79 0.52 0.08 asserted 0.98
s4 The temperature of the electroweak phase transition must be in the (1-10) GeV range. result 0.90 0.52 0.07 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from argument 0.52.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In the supersymmetric framework, a higgsino asymmetry exists in the universe before the electroweak phase transition. We investigate whether the higgsino is a viable asymmetric dark matter candidate. We find that this is indeed possible. The gauginos, squarks and sleptons must all be very heavy, such that the only electroweak-scale superpartners are the higgsinos. The temperature of the electroweak phase transition must be in the (1-10) GeV range.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

16 arXiv papers cite this in 28 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 20 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 5 papers

What it cites · 18 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Compares with 2 papers
Cites as background 1 paper
  • Perhaps the most plausible one is via leptogenesis (for a review, see [ref] ).

    Leptogenesis · Introduction · 0.98

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.