Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Neutralinos from Chargino Decays in the Complex MSSM

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 2 Feb 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim These corrections are important for the correct interpretation of LSP and heavier neutralino production at the LHC and at a future linear e+e- collider.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1202.0488 (version 1)
Pith IDIR6NY6LZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC. Schappacher, F. v. d. Pahlen, S. Heinemeyer. "Neutralinos from Chargino Decays in the Complex MSSM." arXiv:1202.0488 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/IR6NY6LZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,978 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.46 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.93 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We review the evaluation of two-body decay modes of charginos in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with complex parameters (cMSSM). Assuming heavy scalar quarks we take into account all decay channels involving charginos, neutralinos, (scalar) leptons, Higgs bosons and SM gauge bosons. The evaluation of the decay widths is based on a full one-loop calculation including hard and soft QED radiation. Here we focus on the decays involving the Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (LSP), i.e. the lightest neutralino, or a heavier neutralino and a W boson. The higher-order corrections of the chargino decay widths can easily reach a level of \pm 10%, translating into corrections of similar size in the respective branching ratios. These corrections are important for the correct interpretation of LSP and heavier neutralino production at the LHC and at a future linear e+e- collider.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We review the evaluation of two-body decay modes of charginos in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with complex parameters (cMSSM). contribution 0.90 0.39 0.07 asserted 0.71
s1 Assuming heavy scalar quarks we take into account all decay channels involving charginos, neutralinos, (scalar) leptons, Higgs bosons and SM gauge bosons. method 0.80 0.79 0.04 asserted 0.97
s2 The evaluation of the decay widths is based on a full one-loop calculation including hard and soft QED radiation. method 0.99 0.81 0.06 asserted 1.00
s3 Here we focus on the decays involving the Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (LSP), i.e. the lightest neutralino, or a heavier neutralino and a W boson. contribution 0.73 0.59 0.06 asserted 0.95
s4 The higher-order corrections of the chargino decay widths can easily reach a level of \pm 10%, translating into corrections of similar size in the respective branching ratios. result 1.00 0.81 0.36 asserted 0.51
s5 These corrections are important for the correct interpretation of LSP and heavier neutralino production at the LHC and at a future linear e+e- collider. interpretation 1.00 0.41 0.32 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.70 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.65.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We review the evaluation of two-body decay modes of charginos in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with complex parameters (cMSSM). Assuming heavy scalar quarks we take into account all decay channels involving charginos, neutralinos, (scalar) leptons, Higgs bosons and SM gauge bosons. The evaluation of the decay widths is based on a full one-loop calculation including hard and soft QED radiation. Here we focus on the decays involving the Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (LSP), i.e. the lightest neutralino, or a heavier neutralino and a W boson. The higher-order corrections of the chargino decay widths can easily reach a level of \pm 10%, translating into corrections of similar size in the respective branching ratios. These corrections are important for the correct interpretation of LSP and heavier neutralino production at the LHC and at a future linear e+e- collider.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

What it cites · 8 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 7 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.