REVIEW 1 cited by
On Measurement Bias in Causal Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper addresses the problem of measurement errors in causal inference and highlights several algebraic and graphical methods for eliminating systematic bias induced by such errors. In particulars, the paper discusses the control of partially observable confounders in parametric and non parametric models and the computational problem of obtaining bias-free effect estimates in such models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Policy Evaluation with Latent Confounders via Optimal Balance
An importance-weighting estimator for offline policy evaluation that provably achieves root-n consistency using proxies for latent confounders, without fitting an outcome model.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.