RECORD
Arguments Against a Finite N=8 Supergravity
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 25 May 2012
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim I present arguments based on dispersion theory and the existence of charged BPS states of small charge, that maximally supersymmetric SUGRA is not a finite theory.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
I present arguments based on dispersion theory and the existence of charged BPS states of small charge, that maximally supersymmetric SUGRA is not a finite theory. The essence of the argument is that the perturbative construction of the theory implies that scattering amplitudes are invariant under a continuous SU(8) global symmetry, which is broken by contributions from virtual BPS states. Conventional estimates of the contributions of those states above production threshold, shows that they should be order one. If the amplitude satisfies a dispersion relation with a finite number of subtractions, as has recently been argued by Giddings and Porto [1], then SU(8) violating amplitudes appear at finite orders in the low energy expansion. We also make a brief remark about the inconsistency of the idea of classicalization in non-gravitational theories.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | I present arguments based on dispersion theory and the existence of charged BPS states of small charge, that maximally supersymmetric SUGRA is not a finite theory. | result 0.63 | 0.88 | 0.95 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | The essence of the argument is that the perturbative construction of the theory implies that scattering amplitudes are invariant under a continuous SU(8) global symmetry, which is broken by contributions from virtual BPS states. | method 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.10 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Conventional estimates of the contributions of those states above production threshold, shows that they should be order one. | result 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.03 | asserted 0.86 |
| s3 | If the amplitude satisfies a dispersion relation with a finite number of subtractions, as has recently been argued by Giddings and Porto [1], then SU(8) violating amplitudes appear at finite orders in the low energy expansion. | result 0.63 | 0.19 | 0.14 | asserted 0.64 |
| s4 | We also make a brief remark about the inconsistency of the idea of classicalization in non-gravitational theories. | contribution 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.02 | asserted 0.85 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
I present arguments based on dispersion theory and the existence of charged BPS states of small charge, that maximally supersymmetric SUGRA is not a finite theory. The essence of the argument is that the perturbative construction of the theory implies that scattering amplitudes are invariant under a continuous SU(8) global symmetry, which is broken by contributions from virtual BPS states. Conventional estimates of the contributions of those states above production threshold, shows that they should be order one. If the amplitude satisfies a dispersion relation with a finite number of subtractions, as has recently been argued by Giddings and Porto [1], then SU(8) violating amplitudes appear at finite orders in the low energy expansion. We also make a brief remark about the inconsistency of the idea of classicalization in non-gravitational theories.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
10 arXiv papers cite this in 13 sentences
Papers citing it · 11 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as support 1 paper
-
A more explicit and general argument supporting unsubtracted dispersion relations is that, as argued in Refs. [ref] (see also [ref] ), the gravitational 2-body elastic scattering amplitude $f(s,t)$ of any theory obeying Hermitian unitarity and crossing symmetry is polynomially bound in the complex-$s$ upper half plane for fixed Mandelstam variable $t$.
New Sum Rules from Low Energy Compton Scattering on Arbitrary Spin Target · A Puzzle with $N=8$ Supergravity and a Possible Solution · 1.00
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
Since gravity is perturbatively non-renormalisable, its naive quantisation leads to divergent amplitudes unless some unexpected cancellation takes place.[This is only conjectured to happen for highly symmetric theories such as $𝒩=8$ supergravity (see [ref] as well as references therein for recent arguments in favour of and against this possibility).] Amplitudes in string theory, on the other hand, are believed to be finite.
Backreaction of Localised Sources in String Compactifications · Introduction · 0.88
What it cites · 14 sentences without a confident label
Cites as support 1 paper
-
Green, Ooguri and Schwarz [ref] have shown that there are no limits of string theory in which all the BPS states decouple.
Decoupling Supergravity from the Superstring · Introduction · 0.98
Cites as background 1 paper
-
There has been a lot of interest in recent years in the question of whether $N=8$ supergravity (SUGRA) has a finite S-matrix in perturbation theory [ref] .
Non-renormalisation Conditions in Type II String Theory and Maximal Supergravity · Introduction · 1.00
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.