Pith.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · arXiv:1206.0732 v4 · submitted 4 Jun 2012

Relativistic corrections and non-Gaussianity in radio continuum surveys

Roy Maartens, Gong-Bo Zhao, David Bacon, Kazuya Koyama, Alvise Raccanelli

The paper says

“We find that non-Gaussianity dominates over GR corrections, and rises above cosmic variance when $f_{\rm NL}\gtrsim5$ for SKA continuum surveys.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

Forthcoming radio continuum surveys will cover large volumes of the observable Universe and will reach to high redshifts, making them potentially powerful probes of dark energy, modified gravity and non-Gaussianity. Here we extend recent works by analyzing the general relativistic (GR) corrections to the angular power spectrum. These GR corrections to the standard Newtonian analysis of the power spectrum become significant on scales near and beyond the Hubble scale at each redshift. We consider the continuum surveys with LOFAR, WSRT and ASKAP, and examples of continuum surveys with the SKA. We find that the GR corrections are at most percent-level in LOFAR, WODAN and EMU surveys, but they can produce $O(10%)$ changes for high enough sensitivity SKA continuum surveys. The signal is however dominated by cosmic variance, and multiple-tracer observations will be needed to overcome this problem. The GR corrections are suppressed in continuum surveys because of the integration over redshift – we expect that GR corrections will be enhanced for future SKA HI surveys in which the source redshifts will be known. We also provide predictions for the angular power spectra in the case where the primordial perturbations have local non-Gaussianity. We find that non-Gaussianity dominates over GR corrections, and rises above cosmic variance when $f_{\rm NL}\gtrsim5$ for SKA continuum surveys.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.93 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.20 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.81 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v4). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
Forthcoming radio continuum surveys will cover large volumes of the observable Universe and will reach to high redshifts, making them potentially powerful probes of dark energy, modified gravity and non-Gaussianity. background 1.00 0.06 0.05 hedged possibility 0.99
Here we extend recent works by analyzing the general relativistic (GR) corrections to the angular power spectrum. contribution 0.99 0.90 0.05 asserted 0.93
These GR corrections to the standard Newtonian analysis of the power spectrum become significant on scales near and beyond the Hubble scale at each redshift. result 0.74 0.40 0.15 asserted 1.00
We consider the continuum surveys with LOFAR, WSRT and ASKAP, and examples of continuum surveys with the SKA. method 0.88 0.34 0.03 asserted 0.75
We find that the GR corrections are at most percent-level in LOFAR, WODAN and EMU surveys, but they can produce $O(10%)$ changes for high enough sensitivity SKA continuum surveys. result 1.00 0.95 0.31 asserted 0.97
The signal is however dominated by cosmic variance, and multiple-tracer observations will be needed to overcome this problem. interpretation 0.38 0.61 0.15 asserted 0.97
The GR corrections are suppressed in continuum surveys because of the integration over redshift -- we expect that GR corrections will be enhanced for future SKA HI surveys in which the source redshifts will be known. interpretation 0.72 0.59 0.11 hedged possibility 0.48
We also provide predictions for the angular power spectra in the case where the primordial perturbations have local non-Gaussianity. contribution 0.99 0.86 0.06 asserted 0.88
We find that non-Gaussianity dominates over GR corrections, and rises above cosmic variance when $f_{\rm NL}\gtrsim5$ for SKA continuum surveys. result 1.00 0.95 0.36 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.65

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v4

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,971 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 10 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

18 arXiv papers cite this in 24 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 19 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 5 papers

What it cites · 22 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 2 papers
  • In this paper, we re-visit the Newtonian analysis of radio continuum surveys, and include for the first time the terms that were not considered in the auto-correlations computed by [ref] – i.e. redshift space distortions, lensing convergence and the GR corrections (potential and velocity terms).

    Cosmological Measurements with Forthcoming Radio Continuum Surveys · Introduction · 0.91

  • In this paper, we re-visit the Newtonian analysis of radio continuum surveys, and include for the first time the terms that were not considered in the auto-correlations computed by [ref] – i.e. redshift space distortions, lensing convergence and the GR corrections (potential and velocity terms).

    Impact of Redshift Information on Cosmological Applications with Next-Generation Radio Surveys · Introduction · 0.91

Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
  • It is useful to define (following [ref] ) ΔC_ℓ^X = C_ℓ^GR- C_ℓ^GR - X, where GR denotes the $C_ℓ$ calculated with the full GR overdensity [ref] and X denotes the contribution from various terms in [ref] and ([ref]): X= (∝∂n·v/∂χ), (∝κ), (∝n·v), Φ, Ψ), Δ^GR corr.

    What galaxy surveys really measure · Observable effects of GR corrections · 0.80

  • It is useful to define (following [ref] ) ΔC_ℓ^X = C_ℓ^GR- C_ℓ^GR - X, where GR denotes the $C_ℓ$ calculated with the full GR overdensity [ref] and X denotes the contribution from various terms in [ref] and ([ref]): X= (∝∂n·v/∂χ), (∝κ), (∝n·v), Φ, Ψ), Δ^GR corr.

    The linear power spectrum of observed source number counts · Observable effects of GR corrections · 0.80

  • In a radio continuum survey, sources are detected via a standard approach, as used in [ref] .

    Cosmological Measurements with Forthcoming Radio Continuum Surveys · Observable effects of GR corrections · 0.86

Uses data or values from 2 papers
Cites as background 17 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment