REVIEW 1 cited by
f(R) Cosmology revisited
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We consider a class of metric f(R) modified gravity theories, analyze them in the context of a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology and confront the results with some of the known constraints imposed by observations. In particular, we focus in correctly reproducing the matter and effective cosmological constant eras, the age of the Universe, and supernovae data. Our analysis differs in many respects from previous studies. First, we avoid any transformation to a scalar-tensor theory in order to be exempted of any potential pathologies (e.g. multivalued scalar potentials) and also to evade any unnecessary discussion regarding frames (i.e. Einstein vs Jordan). Second, based on a robust approach, we recast the cosmology equations as an initial value problem subject to a modified Hamiltonian constraint. Third, we solve the equations numerically where the Ricci scalar itself is one of the variables, and use the constraint equation to monitor the accuracy of the solutions. We compute the "equation of state" (EOS) associated with the modifications of gravity using several inequivalent definitions that have been proposed in the past and analyze it in detail. We argue that one of these definitions has the best features. In particular, we present the EOS around the so called "phantom divide" boundary and compare it with previous findings.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Bayesian PINN Framework for Barrow-Tsallis Holographic Dark Energy with Neutrinos: Toward a Resolution of the Hubble Tension
The fitted Barrow-Tsallis holographic dark energy model gives H0 around 70.5 km/s/Mpc and neutrino mass bounds below 0.114 eV, but the model equation is not actually derived from the claimed entropy, so the central th...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.