Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Fundamental BCJ Relation in N=4 SYM From The Connected Formulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1206.5970 v1 pith:C5QRP5B6 submitted 2012-06-26 hep-th

Fundamental BCJ Relation in N=4 SYM From The Connected Formulation

classification hep-th
keywords amplitudespartialformulationconnectedidentitiesbeendifferentamplitude
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Tree-level amplitudes in N=4 SYM can be decomposed into partial or color-ordered amplitudes. Identities relating various partial amplitudes have been known since the 80's. They are Kleiss-Kuijf (KK) identities. In 2008, Bern, Carrasco and Johansson (BCJ) introduced a new set of identities which reduce the number of independent partial amplitudes to (n-3)!. In recent years, several formulations for partial amplitudes have been discovered and shown to be equivalent to each other. These can be thought of as simple dualities in the sense that different formulations make manifest different properties of the same object; the amplitude. One such formulation is the ACCK Grassmannian formulation which makes Yangian invariance of individual partial amplitudes manifest. A different formulation is the so-called connected formula introduced by Witten in twistor space and formulated in momentum space by Roiban, Spradlin and Volovich. It has been argued that the connected formula is ideal for studying properties which are related to the full amplitude, such as the KK relations, and not to particular partial amplitudes, like Yangian invariance. Following this logic, it is very natural to expect that the BCJ identities should have a very simple proof in the connected formulation. In this short note we show that this is indeed the case.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.