Pith. Sign in

RECORD

D-wave-like nodal superconductivity in the organic conductor (TMTSF)2ClO4

Superconductivity · Submitted 31 Aug 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In our opinion, the obtained results are strongly in favor of d-wave-like nodal superconductivity in (TMTSF)2ClO4, whereas, in a sister compound, (TMTSF)2PF6, we expect either the existence of triplet order parameter or the coexistence of triplet and singlet order parameters.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.72 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1208.6553 (version 1)
Pith IDOXBWYEFO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. G. Lebed. "D-wave-like nodal superconductivity in the organic conductor (TMTSF)2ClO4." arXiv:1208.6553 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/OXBWYEFO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,923 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.41 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.78 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We suggest theoretical explanation of the high upper critical magnetic field, perpendicular to conducting chains, Hc2, experimentally observed in the superconductor (TMTSF)2ClO4, in terms of singlet superconducting pairing. In particular, we compare the results of d-wave-like nodal, d-wave-like node-less, and s-wave scenarios of superconductivity. We show that, in d-wave-like nodal scenario, superconductivity can naturally exceed both the orbital upper critical magnetic field and Clogston-Shandrasekhar paramagnetic limit as well as reach experimental value, Hc2 = 6T, in contrast to d-wave-like node-less and s-wave scenarios. In our opinion, the obtained results are strongly in favor of d-wave-like nodal superconductivity in (TMTSF)2ClO4, whereas, in a sister compound, (TMTSF)2PF6, we expect either the existence of triplet order parameter or the coexistence of triplet and singlet order parameters.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We suggest theoretical explanation of the high upper critical magnetic field, perpendicular to conducting chains, Hc2, experimentally observed in the superconductor (TMTSF)2ClO4, in terms of singlet superconducting pairing. contribution 0.97 0.67 0.13 hedged possibility 0.79
s1 In particular, we compare the results of d-wave-like nodal, d-wave-like node-less, and s-wave scenarios of superconductivity. method 0.63 0.78 0.03 asserted 0.67
s2 We show that, in d-wave-like nodal scenario, superconductivity can naturally exceed both the orbital upper critical magnetic field and Clogston-Shandrasekhar paramagnetic limit as well as reach experimental value, Hc2 = 6T, in contrast to d-wave-like node-less and s-wave scenarios. result 1.00 0.91 0.42 asserted 0.90
s3 In our opinion, the obtained results are strongly in favor of d-wave-like nodal superconductivity in (TMTSF)2ClO4, whereas, in a sister compound, (TMTSF)2PF6, we expect either the existence of triplet order parameter or the coexistence of triplet and singlet order parameters. interpretation 1.00 0.71 0.88 hedged possibility 0.72

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.44.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We suggest theoretical explanation of the high upper critical magnetic field, perpendicular to conducting chains, Hc2, experimentally observed in the superconductor (TMTSF)2ClO4, in terms of singlet superconducting pairing. In particular, we compare the results of d-wave-like nodal, d-wave-like node-less, and s-wave scenarios of superconductivity. We show that, in d-wave-like nodal scenario, superconductivity can naturally exceed both the orbital upper critical magnetic field and Clogston-Shandrasekhar paramagnetic limit as well as reach experimental value, Hc2 = 6T, in contrast to d-wave-like node-less and s-wave scenarios. In our opinion, the obtained results are strongly in favor of d-wave-like nodal superconductivity in (TMTSF)2ClO4, whereas, in a sister compound, (TMTSF)2PF6, we expect either the existence of triplet order parameter or the coexistence of triplet and singlet order parameters.

Human review
How the literature uses it

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

How each label was checked · JSON

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 2 papers
States a conflicting result 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.