Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Defining Quantum Control Flow

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1209.4379 v1 pith:OZOZEA27 submitted 2012-09-19 quant-ph cs.LOcs.PL

Defining Quantum Control Flow

classification quant-ph cs.LOcs.PL
keywords quantumcontrolflowclassicaldefiningchoicesdifferenceflows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A remarkable difference between quantum and classical programs is that the control flow of the former can be either classical or quantum. One of the key issues in the theory of quantum programming languages is defining and understanding quantum control flow. A functional language with quantum control flow was defined by Altenkirch and Grattage [\textit{Proc. LICS'05}, pp. 249-258]. This paper extends their work, and we introduce a general quantum control structure by defining three new quantum program constructs, namely quantum guarded command, quantum choice and quantum recursion. We clarify the relation between quantum choices and probabilistic choices. An interesting difference between quantum recursions with classical control flows and with quantum control flows is revealed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.