REVIEW 1 cited by
K*Sigma photoproduction off the proton target with baryon resonances
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We investigate the photoproduction of K*0Sigma+ and K*+Sigma0 off the proton target, employing the effective Lagrangian approach at the tree-level Born approximation. In addition to the (s, t, u)-channel Born diagrams, we take into account various baryon-resonance contributions such as F15(2000), D13(2080), G17(2190), D15(2200), F35(2000), G37(2200), F37(2390), and Sigma*(1385, 3/2+) in a fully covariant manner. We present the numerical results for the energy and angular dependences for the cross sections in comparison to available experimental data. The single-polarization observables, i.e. the photon-beam, recoil and target baryon polarization asymmetries are computed as well for future experiments. We observe from the numerical results that the resonance contributions play a minor role in producing the strength of the cross sections, being different from the K*Lambda photoproduction. In contrast, it turns out that the Delta(1232)-pole contribution and strange-meson exchanges in the t-channel dominate the scattering process. On the other hand, the higher resonances influence the polarization observables such as the recoil and target asymmetries.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Roles of $\Delta(1232)$, $N^*(1520)$, and $N^*(1650)$ resonances in $\gamma p\to \pi^0 \pi^0 p$ reaction within an effective Lagrangian approach
A tree-level effective Lagrangian model with Delta(1232), N*(1520), and N*(1650) reproduces the LEPS2/BGOegg gamma p to pi0 pi0 p data, assigning Delta(1232) to s-channel nucleon-pole production and the two N* resonan...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.