Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Duration of local violations of the second law of thermodynamics along single trajectories in phase space

Statistical Mechanics · Submitted 4 Dec 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In the large-$\tau$ and large-$N$ limit we show that, for ergodic and microreversible systems, the mean value of $\nu$ scales as $\langle\nu(N,\tau)\rangle\sim\big(\tau N^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha}}\big)^{-1}$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1212.0844 (version 5)
Pith ID7OYRJZ7D, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDaniel Dom\'inguez, Reinaldo Garc\'ia-Garc\'ia. "Duration of local violations of the second law of thermodynamics along single trajectories in phase space." arXiv:1212.0844 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/7OYRJZ7D
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,701 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.90 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.93 · compares with prior results 0.15 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v5. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We define the {\it violation fraction} $\nu$ as the cumulative fraction of time that the entropy change is negative during single realizations of processes in phase space. This quantity depends both on the number of degrees of freedom $N$ and the duration of the time interval $\tau$. In the large-$\tau$ and large-$N$ limit we show that, for ergodic and microreversible systems, the mean value of $\nu$ scales as $\langle\nu(N,\tau)\rangle\sim\big(\tau N^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha}}\big)^{-1}$. The exponent $\alpha$ is positive and generally depends on the protocol for the external driving forces, being $\alpha=1$ for a constant drive. As an example, we study a nontrivial model where the fluctuations of the entropy production are non-Gaussian: an elastic line driven at a constant rate by an anharmonic trap. In this case we show that the scaling of $\langle \nu \rangle$ with $N$ and $\tau$ agrees with our result. Finally, we discuss how this scaling law may break down in the vicinity of a continuous phase transition.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We define the {\it violation fraction} $\nu$ as the cumulative fraction of time that the entropy change is negative during single realizations of processes in phase space. contribution 0.69 0.85 0.04 asserted 0.98
s1 This quantity depends both on the number of degrees of freedom $N$ and the duration of the time interval $\tau$. background 0.44 0.50 0.05 asserted 1.00
s2 In the large-$\tau$ and large-$N$ limit we show that, for ergodic and microreversible systems, the mean value of $\nu$ scales as $\langle\nu(N,\tau)\rangle\sim\big(\tau N^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha}}\big)^{-1}$. result 1.00 0.94 0.81 asserted 1.00
s3 The exponent $\alpha$ is positive and generally depends on the protocol for the external driving forces, being $\alpha=1$ for a constant drive. result 0.92 0.69 0.13 asserted 0.98
s4 As an example, we study a nontrivial model where the fluctuations of the entropy production are non-Gaussian: an elastic line driven at a constant rate by an anharmonic trap. method 0.52 0.90 0.03 asserted 0.95
s5 In this case we show that the scaling of $\langle \nu \rangle$ with $N$ and $\tau$ agrees with our result. result 0.94 0.95 0.09 asserted 1.00
s6 Finally, we discuss how this scaling law may break down in the vicinity of a continuous phase transition. limitation 0.72 0.48 0.05 hedged possibility 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.93.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v5
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We define the {\it violation fraction} $\nu$ as the cumulative fraction of time that the entropy change is negative during single realizations of processes in phase space. This quantity depends both on the number of degrees of freedom $N$ and the duration of the time interval $\tau$. In the large-$\tau$ and large-$N$ limit we show that, for ergodic and microreversible systems, the mean value of $\nu$ scales as $\langle\nu(N,\tau)\rangle\sim\big(\tau N^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha}}\big)^{-1}$. The exponent $\alpha$ is positive and generally depends on the protocol for the external driving forces, being $\alpha=1$ for a constant drive. As an example, we study a nontrivial model where the fluctuations of the entropy production are non-Gaussian: an elastic line driven at a constant rate by an anharmonic trap. In this case we show that the scaling of $\langle \nu \rangle$ with $N$ and $\tau$ agrees with our result. Finally, we discuss how this scaling law may break down in the vicinity of a continuous phase transition.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.