Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Brute force searching, the typical set and Guesswork

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1301.6356 v3 pith:5UL4C4J7 submitted 2013-01-27 cs.IT cs.CRmath.IT

classification cs.ITcs.CRmath.IT
keywords wordguessworktypicalapproximationattackerchosenlistsource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Consider the situation where a word is chosen probabilistically from a finite list. If an attacker knows the list and can inquire about each word in turn, then selecting the word via the uniform distribution maximizes the attacker's difficulty, its Guesswork, in identifying the chosen word. It is tempting to use this property in cryptanalysis of computationally secure ciphers by assuming coded words are drawn from a source's typical set and so, for all intents and purposes, uniformly distributed within it. By applying recent results on Guesswork, for i.i.d. sources it is this equipartition ansatz that we investigate here. In particular, we demonstrate that the expected Guesswork for a source conditioned to create words in the typical set grows, with word length, at a lower exponential rate than that of the uniform approximation, suggesting use of the approximation is ill-advised.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools