Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The price of bandit information in multiclass online classification

Machine Learning · Submitted 5 Feb 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that the ratio between the error rates in the two scenarios is at most $8\cdot|Y|\cdot \log(|Y|)$ in the realizable case, and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{|Y|})$ in the agnostic case.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1302.1043 (version 2)
Pith IDBHSWPYSX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAmit Daniely, Tom Helbertal. "The price of bandit information in multiclass online classification." arXiv:1302.1043 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/BHSWPYSX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,381 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.46 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.80 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider two scenarios of multiclass online learning of a hypothesis class $H\subseteq Y^X$. In the {\em full information} scenario, the learner is exposed to instances together with their labels. In the {\em bandit} scenario, the true label is not exposed, but rather an indication whether the learner's prediction is correct or not. We show that the ratio between the error rates in the two scenarios is at most $8\cdot|Y|\cdot \log(|Y|)$ in the realizable case, and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{|Y|})$ in the agnostic case. The results are tight up to a logarithmic factor and essentially answer an open question from (Daniely et. al. - Multiclass learnability and the erm principle). We apply these results to the class of $\gamma$-margin multiclass linear classifiers in $\reals^d$. We show that the bandit error rate of this class is $\tilde{\Theta}(\frac{|Y|}{\gamma^2})$ in the realizable case and $\tilde{\Theta}(\frac{1}{\gamma}\sqrt{|Y|T})$ in the agnostic case. This resolves an open question from (Kakade et. al. - Efficient bandit algorithms for online multiclass prediction).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider two scenarios of multiclass online learning of a hypothesis class $H\subseteq Y^X$. background 0.71 0.35 0.02 asserted 0.68
s1 In the {\em full information} scenario, the learner is exposed to instances together with their labels. background 0.91 0.08 0.01 asserted 0.98
s2 In the {\em bandit} scenario, the true label is not exposed, but rather an indication whether the learner's prediction is correct or not. background 0.87 0.09 0.02 asserted 0.98
s3 We show that the ratio between the error rates in the two scenarios is at most $8\cdot|Y|\cdot \log(|Y|)$ in the realizable case, and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{|Y|})$ in the agnostic case. result 1.00 0.96 0.81 asserted 1.00
s4 The results are tight up to a logarithmic factor and essentially answer an open question from (Daniely et. al. - Multiclass learnability and the erm principle). interpretation 0.88 0.81 0.22 asserted 0.99
s5 We apply these results to the class of $\gamma$-margin multiclass linear classifiers in $\reals^d$. contribution 0.88 0.85 0.03 asserted 0.81
s6 We show that the bandit error rate of this class is $\tilde{\Theta}(\frac{|Y|}{\gamma^2})$ in the realizable case and $\tilde{\Theta}(\frac{1}{\gamma}\sqrt{|Y|T})$ in the agnostic case. result 1.00 0.96 0.21 asserted 1.00
s7 This resolves an open question from (Kakade et. al. - Efficient bandit algorithms for online multiclass prediction). interpretation 0.71 0.71 0.10 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider two scenarios of multiclass online learning of a hypothesis class $H\subseteq Y^X$. In the {\em full information} scenario, the learner is exposed to instances together with their labels. In the {\em bandit} scenario, the true label is not exposed, but rather an indication whether the learner's prediction is correct or not. We show that the ratio between the error rates in the two scenarios is at most $8\cdot|Y|\cdot \log(|Y|)$ in the realizable case, and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{|Y|})$ in the agnostic case. The results are tight up to a logarithmic factor and essentially answer an open question from (Daniely et. al. - Multiclass learnability and the erm principle). We apply these results to the class of $\gamma$-margin multiclass linear classifiers in $\reals^d$. We show that the bandit error rate of this class is $\tilde{\Theta}(\frac{|Y|}{\gamma^2})$ in the realizable case and $\tilde{\Theta}(\frac{1}{\gamma}\sqrt{|Y|T})$ in the agnostic case. This resolves an open question from (Kakade et. al. - Efficient bandit algorithms for online multiclass prediction).

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.