Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Characteristics of Compound Multiplicity in 84^Kr_36 with various light and heavy targets at 1 GeV per nucleon

Nuclear Experiment · Submitted 14 Mar 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The observation showed that the width of the compound multiplicity distributions and value of the mean compound multiplicity have linear relation with the mass number of the projectile as well as colliding system.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1303.3362 (version 1)
Pith IDSNFLUVKF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationM. K. Singh, N. S. Chouhan, V. Singh. "Characteristics of Compound Multiplicity in 84^Kr_36 with various light and heavy targets at 1 GeV per nucleon." arXiv:1303.3362 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/SNFLUVKF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,373 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.32 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Present article focuses on the interactions of 84 Kr 36 having kinetic energy around 1 GeV per nucleon with NIKFI BR2 nuclear emulsion detectors targets, that can reveal important features of some compound multiplicity. The observation showed that the width of the compound multiplicity distributions and value of the mean compound multiplicity have linear relation with the mass number of the projectile as well as colliding system.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Present article focuses on the interactions of 84 Kr 36 having kinetic energy around 1 GeV per nucleon with NIKFI BR2 nuclear emulsion detectors targets, that can reveal important features of some compound multiplicity. contribution 0.74 0.58 0.05 asserted 0.54
s1 The observation showed that the width of the compound multiplicity distributions and value of the mean compound multiplicity have linear relation with the mass number of the projectile as well as colliding system. result 1.00 0.89 0.76 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Present article focuses on the interactions of 84 Kr 36 having kinetic energy around 1 GeV per nucleon with NIKFI BR2 nuclear emulsion detectors targets, that can reveal important features of some compound multiplicity. The observation showed that the width of the compound multiplicity distributions and value of the mean compound multiplicity have linear relation with the mass number of the projectile as well as colliding system.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.