Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Restoration of Images Corrupted by Impulse Noise and Mixed Gaussian Impulse Noise using Blind Inpainting

Optimization and Control · Submitted 4 Apr 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim By iteratively restoring the image and updating the set of damaged pixels, these methods have better performance than other methods, as shown in the experiments.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1304.1408 (version 1)
Pith IDONPVXYSM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMing Yan. "Restoration of Images Corrupted by Impulse Noise and Mixed Gaussian Impulse Noise using Blind Inpainting." arXiv:1304.1408 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/ONPVXYSM
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,853 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.28 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.39 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.88 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This article studies the problem of image restoration of observed images corrupted by impulse noise and mixed Gaussian impulse noise. Since the pixels damaged by impulse noise contain no information about the true image, how to find this set correctly is a very important problem. We propose two methods based on blind inpainting and $\ell_0$ minimization that can simultaneously find the damaged pixels and restore the image. By iteratively restoring the image and updating the set of damaged pixels, these methods have better performance than other methods, as shown in the experiments. In addition, we provide convergence analysis for these methods, these algorithms will converge to coordinatewise minimum points. In addition, they will converge to local minimum points (or with probability one) with some modifications in the algorithms.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This article studies the problem of image restoration of observed images corrupted by impulse noise and mixed Gaussian impulse noise. background 0.91 0.47 0.04 asserted 0.96
s1 Since the pixels damaged by impulse noise contain no information about the true image, how to find this set correctly is a very important problem. background 0.84 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.99
s2 We propose two methods based on blind inpainting and $\ell_0$ minimization that can simultaneously find the damaged pixels and restore the image. contribution 0.80 0.95 0.32 asserted 0.96
s3 By iteratively restoring the image and updating the set of damaged pixels, these methods have better performance than other methods, as shown in the experiments. result 0.96 0.94 0.53 asserted 1.00
s4 In addition, we provide convergence analysis for these methods, these algorithms will converge to coordinatewise minimum points. contribution 0.74 0.93 0.14 asserted 1.00
s5 In addition, they will converge to local minimum points (or with probability one) with some modifications in the algorithms. result 0.77 0.86 0.09 asserted 0.63

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.52.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This article studies the problem of image restoration of observed images corrupted by impulse noise and mixed Gaussian impulse noise. Since the pixels damaged by impulse noise contain no information about the true image, how to find this set correctly is a very important problem. We propose two methods based on blind inpainting and $\ell_0$ minimization that can simultaneously find the damaged pixels and restore the image. By iteratively restoring the image and updating the set of damaged pixels, these methods have better performance than other methods, as shown in the experiments. In addition, we provide convergence analysis for these methods, these algorithms will converge to coordinatewise minimum points. In addition, they will converge to local minimum points (or with probability one) with some modifications in the algorithms.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Compares with 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.