RECORD
Distributed Cognitive Multiple Access Networks: Power Control, Scheduling and Multiuser Diversity
Information Theory · Submitted 13 Apr 2013
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim From a practical point of view, our results signify the fact that distributed cognitive multiple access networks are capable of harvesting multiuser diversity gains without employing centralized schedulers and feedback links as well as without disrupting primary's quality-of-service (QoS)
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This paper studies optimal distributed power allocation and scheduling policies (DPASPs) for distributed total power and interference limited (DTPIL) cognitive multiple access networks in which secondary users (SU) independently perform power allocation and scheduling tasks using their local knowledge of secondary transmitter secondary base-station (STSB) and secondary transmitter primary base-station (STPB) channel gains. In such networks, transmission powers of SUs are limited by an average total transmission power constraint and by a constraint on the average interference power that SUs cause to the primary base-station. We first establish the joint optimality of water-filling power allocation and threshold-based scheduling policies for DTPIL networks. We then show that the secondary network throughput under the optimal DPASP scales according to $\frac{1}{\e{}n_h}\log\logp{N}$, where $n_h$ is a parameter obtained from the distribution of STSB channel power gains and $N$ is the total number of SUs. From a practical point of view, our results signify the fact that distributed cognitive multiple access networks are capable of harvesting multiuser diversity gains without employing centralized schedulers and feedback links as well as without disrupting primary's quality-of-service (QoS)
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | This paper studies optimal distributed power allocation and scheduling policies (DPASPs) for distributed total power and interference limited (DTPIL) cognitive multiple access networks in which secondary users (SU) independently perform power allocation and scheduling tasks using their local knowledge of secondary transmitter secondary base-station (STSB) and secondary transmitter primary base-station (STPB) channel gains. | contribution 0.90 | 0.66 | 0.07 | asserted 0.92 |
| s1 | In such networks, transmission powers of SUs are limited by an average total transmission power constraint and by a constraint on the average interference power that SUs cause to the primary base-station. | background 0.99 | 0.14 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We first establish the joint optimality of water-filling power allocation and threshold-based scheduling policies for DTPIL networks. | result 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.26 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | We then show that the secondary network throughput under the optimal DPASP scales according to $\frac{1}{\e{}n_h}\log\logp{N}$, where $n_h$ is a parameter obtained from the distribution of STSB channel power gains and $N$ is the total number of SUs. | result 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.26 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | From a practical point of view, our results signify the fact that distributed cognitive multiple access networks are capable of harvesting multiuser diversity gains without employing centralized schedulers and feedback links as well as without disrupting primary's quality-of-service (QoS) | interpretation 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.61 | asserted 0.69 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
This paper studies optimal distributed power allocation and scheduling policies (DPASPs) for distributed total power and interference limited (DTPIL) cognitive multiple access networks in which secondary users (SU) independently perform power allocation and scheduling tasks using their local knowledge of secondary transmitter secondary base-station (STSB) and secondary transmitter primary base-station (STPB) channel gains. In such networks, transmission powers of SUs are limited by an average total transmission power constraint and by a constraint on the average interference power that SUs cause to the primary base-station. We first establish the joint optimality of water-filling power allocation and threshold-based scheduling policies for DTPIL networks. We then show that the secondary network throughput under the optimal DPASP scales according to $\frac{1}{\e{}n_h}\log\logp{N}$, where $n_h$ is a parameter obtained from the distribution of STSB channel power gains and $N$ is the total number of SUs. From a practical point of view, our results signify the fact that distributed cognitive multiple access networks are capable of harvesting multiuser diversity gains without employing centralized schedulers and feedback links as well as without disrupting primary's quality-of-service (QoS)
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.