Pith. Sign in

RECORD

PEACE: Pulsar Evaluation Algorithm for Candidate Extraction -- A software package for post-analysis processing of pulsar survey candidates

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics · Submitted 2 May 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This clearly demonstrates that PEACE significantly increases the pulsar identification rate by a factor of about 50 to 1000.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1305.0447 (version 1)
Pith IDSZBFMOLO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Brazier, A. Lyne, A. Mata, A. Walker, B. Allen, B. Knispel, C. .M. Biwer, D. J. Champion, E. D. Barr, F. A. Jenet, F. Camilo, F. Crawford, G. Desvignes, G. Lunsford, I. Stairs, J. Cordes, J. Deneva, J. Flanigan, J. Martinez, J. van Leeuwen, J. W. T. Hessels, K. J. Lee, K. Stovall, L. P. Dartez, L. Spitler, M. Kramer, M. McLaughlin, M. Rohr, M. Tan, N. D. R. Bhat, P. Freire, P. Lazarus, P. Scholz, R. D. Ferdman, R. Karuppusamy, R. Lynch, S. Banaszak, S. Bogdanov, S. Chatterjee, S. Cohen, S. Ransom, V.M. Kaspi, W. W. Zhu, X. Siemens. "PEACE: Pulsar Evaluation Algorithm for Candidate Extraction -- A software package for post-analysis processing of pulsar survey candidates." arXiv:1305.0447 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/SZBFMOLO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,141 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.16 · human participants 0.76 · controlled comparison 0.29 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.53 · mentions code or data availability 0.09.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Modern radio pulsar surveys produce a large volume of prospective candidates, the majority of which are polluted by human-created radio frequency interference or other forms of noise. Typically, large numbers of candidates need to be visually inspected in order to determine if they are real pulsars. This process can be labor intensive. In this paper, we introduce an algorithm called PEACE (Pulsar Evaluation Algorithm for Candidate Extraction) which improves the efficiency of identifying pulsar signals. The algorithm ranks the candidates based on a score function. Unlike popular machine-learning based algorithms, no prior training data sets are required. This algorithm has been applied to data from several large-scale radio pulsar surveys. Using the human-based ranking results generated by students in the Arecibo Remote Command enter programme, the statistical performance of PEACE was evaluated. It was found that PEACE ranked 68% of the student-identified pulsars within the top 0.17% of sorted candidates, 95% within the top 0.34%, and 100% within the top 3.7%. This clearly demonstrates that PEACE significantly increases the pulsar identification rate by a factor of about 50 to 1000. To date, PEACE has been directly responsible for the discovery of 47 new pulsars, 5 of which are millisecond pulsars that may be useful for pulsar timing based gravitational-wave detection projects.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Modern radio pulsar surveys produce a large volume of prospective candidates, the majority of which are polluted by human-created radio frequency interference or other forms of noise. background 1.00 0.07 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Typically, large numbers of candidates need to be visually inspected in order to determine if they are real pulsars. background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 0.99
s2 This process can be labor intensive. background 0.98 0.06 0.01 asserted 1.00
s3 In this paper, we introduce an algorithm called PEACE (Pulsar Evaluation Algorithm for Candidate Extraction) which improves the efficiency of identifying pulsar signals. contribution 1.00 0.89 0.16 asserted 1.00
s4 The algorithm ranks the candidates based on a score function. method 0.97 0.80 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 Unlike popular machine-learning based algorithms, no prior training data sets are required. method 0.76 0.38 0.03 asserted 1.00
s6 This algorithm has been applied to data from several large-scale radio pulsar surveys. method 0.74 0.85 0.03 asserted 1.00
s7 Using the human-based ranking results generated by students in the Arecibo Remote Command enter programme, the statistical performance of PEACE was evaluated. method 0.97 0.84 0.03 asserted 0.97
s8 It was found that PEACE ranked 68% of the student-identified pulsars within the top 0.17% of sorted candidates, 95% within the top 0.34%, and 100% within the top 3.7%. result 1.00 0.93 0.20 asserted 1.00
s9 This clearly demonstrates that PEACE significantly increases the pulsar identification rate by a factor of about 50 to 1000. interpretation 0.97 0.89 0.62 asserted 1.00
s10 To date, PEACE has been directly responsible for the discovery of 47 new pulsars, 5 of which are millisecond pulsars that may be useful for pulsar timing based gravitational-wave detection projects. result 0.95 0.86 0.15 asserted 0.93

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Modern radio pulsar surveys produce a large volume of prospective candidates, the majority of which are polluted by human-created radio frequency interference or other forms of noise. Typically, large numbers of candidates need to be visually inspected in order to determine if they are real pulsars. This process can be labor intensive. In this paper, we introduce an algorithm called PEACE (Pulsar Evaluation Algorithm for Candidate Extraction) which improves the efficiency of identifying pulsar signals. The algorithm ranks the candidates based on a score function. Unlike popular machine-learning based algorithms, no prior training data sets are required. This algorithm has been applied to data from several large-scale radio pulsar surveys. Using the human-based ranking results generated by students in the Arecibo Remote Command enter programme, the statistical performance of PEACE was evaluated. It was found that PEACE ranked 68% of the student-identified pulsars within the top 0.17% of sorted candidates, 95% within the top 0.34%, and 100% within the top 3.7%. This clearly demonstrates that PEACE significantly increases the pulsar identification rate by a factor of about 50 to 1000. To date, PEACE has been directly responsible for the discovery of 47 new pulsars, 5 of which are millisecond pulsars that may be useful for pulsar timing based gravitational-wave detection projects.

Human review
References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.