Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Absolute cross-section normalization of magnetic neutron scattering data

Superconductivity · Submitted 23 May 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Formulas that can be used for general purposes are provided and the advantages of the different normalization processes are discussed.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1305.5521 (version 1)
Pith IDNQDXTEZD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGuangyong Xu, J. M. Tranquada, Zhijun Xu. "Absolute cross-section normalization of magnetic neutron scattering data." arXiv:1305.5521 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/NQDXTEZD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,516 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.39 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We discuss various methods to obtain the resolution volume for neutron scattering experiments, in order to perform absolute normalization on inelastic magnetic neutron scattering data. Examples from previous experiments are given. We also try to provide clear definitions of a number of physical quantities which are commonly used to describe neutron magnetic scattering results, including the dynamic spin correlation function and the imaginary part of the dynamic susceptibility. Formulas that can be used for general purposes are provided and the advantages of the different normalization processes are discussed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We discuss various methods to obtain the resolution volume for neutron scattering experiments, in order to perform absolute normalization on inelastic magnetic neutron scattering data. contribution 0.95 0.47 0.16 asserted 0.86
s1 Examples from previous experiments are given. contribution 0.61 0.35 0.03 asserted 0.94
s2 We also try to provide clear definitions of a number of physical quantities which are commonly used to describe neutron magnetic scattering results, including the dynamic spin correlation function and the imaginary part of the dynamic susceptibility. contribution 0.97 0.76 0.07 hedged possibility 0.52
s3 Formulas that can be used for general purposes are provided and the advantages of the different normalization processes are discussed. contribution 0.92 0.83 0.12 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from argument 0.37.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We discuss various methods to obtain the resolution volume for neutron scattering experiments, in order to perform absolute normalization on inelastic magnetic neutron scattering data. Examples from previous experiments are given. We also try to provide clear definitions of a number of physical quantities which are commonly used to describe neutron magnetic scattering results, including the dynamic spin correlation function and the imaginary part of the dynamic susceptibility. Formulas that can be used for general purposes are provided and the advantages of the different normalization processes are discussed.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Uses its method or tool 2 papers
  • The measured intensity $I_meas$ was normalized into absolute units of $μ_B^2$eV$^-1$/Fe by the integrated incoherent elastic scattering intensity $I_inc$ from the sample, using the formula [ref] [equation] where $μ_B$ is the Bohr magneton, $f(Q)$ is the wave-vector ($Q$) dependent magnetic form factor of Fe$^2+$, p is a constant of 0.27$×$10$^-12$ cm, $n_j$ and $σ_inc, j$ are the molar ratio and the incoherent cross section for the element in the compound respectively.

    Enhanced low-energy magnetic excitations via suppression of the itinerancy in Fe0.98-zCuzTe0.5Se0.5 · Experimental · 1.00

  • Contributions from the empty cryostat were subtracted and the measured intensity was normalized to Bragg scattering from the sample [ref] .

    Molecular Quantum Magnetism in LiZn2Mo3O8 · Introduction · 0.96

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.